Himachal Pradesh High Court: Resignation of a Candidate Does Not Entitle Waitlisted Candidates to the Job Position

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

In this case of Dharmender Kumar vs State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., the Petitioner filed a writ of Mandamus before the Court. The main contention was that he is eligible for appointment by the state government. This posed the issue of whether a waiting list candidate should get the post that arose out of joining and later resigning. The Court, consisting, Mr Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Ms Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua as the Coram, did not allow the petition and held it to be against the rules of appointment for the said post.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The Respondent published an advertisement in a newspaper. The ad mentioned a vacancy for the post of an Ophthalmic Officer.

An administrative body of the Himachal Pradesh Government issued the same. The Petitioner applied for this position. He was later put on a waiting list as candidate number two. As one of the selected candidates failed to join the post, the post went to the candidate on the list with waiting number one. But, after joining, this Candidate left the job. 

Following this, the Petitioner claimed his right to be appointed to the post, as he was next in the waiting list. However, the Petitioner was not offered the job. Thus, the Petitioner prayed to the Court to issue a writ of mandamus for an answer from the authority.

The administration supported their action, mentioning the rules of procedure of appointment for the said post. As per the rules, a candidate on a waiting list has no inherent right to get appointed. It is only except when a selected candidate did not take up the post, the seat remained vacant. They further stated that if a vacancy arises due to resignation, it is a fresh vacancy. Also, to fill up a fresh vacancy, the recruitment process has to start from scratch.

Issues Involved

  1. Whether a candidate can fill a vacancy rising out of someone else’s joining and resignation?
  2. Whether the procedure for recruitment is to be started afresh?

Arguments before the Court

The Petitioner claimed that he deserved the said post. The Petitioner stated that in this situation, it was his right to be appointed next. He prayed that the Court issue a writ of mandamus, directing the government to offer him the post.

The Respondent argued that there was no inherent right to the Petitioner. The demands of the Petitioner are against the established Rules of Business & Procedure. These are the governmental rules of the Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Board. 

Court’s Observation

The Court referred to various precedents given by the Supreme Court. These judgments contemplated similar issues. All the precedents had an identical judgement. 

They held that the name on the waiting list does not give entitlement to recruitment. Shortlisting of a candidate, on a waiting list does not raise the right to appointment. Further, the list of the candidates is only used when in specific circumstances. For example, where an appointed candidate does not join the post at the outset. In that case, a candidate on the waiting list would fill up the post.

In this case, the vacancy arose out of the surrender of the post. Thus, fresh recruitments have to be conducted.   

The Court observed that the steps taken by the administration were lawful. The steps were also in compliance with the Rules of Appointment. The Court found no merit in the arguments of the Petitioner.

Court’s Judgement

Making the aforesaid observations, the Court dismissed the petition. The Court affirmed the actions of the government to be lawful. The government complied with the precedents and rules of the appointment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -