Himachal High Court Grants Bail To Petitioners Involved In Awarding Fake Degrees By University

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

In the case of Anupam Thakur and others vs the State of Himachal Pradesh, a bail application was filed by the petitioners, who got arrested for being involved in a case of awarding fake degrees by a university. The bail was granted by the court after concluding that the petitioners would not be a menace in the investigation.

Facts of the Case 

After the complainant saw an advertisement on the news of Manav Bharti University on television, she called the university for admission in M.A. Psychology. As per the instructions received on the call she went to Karnal for admission. The complainant went along with her friend who wanted to pursue LLB from the university as well.

They completed the admission formalities as instructed by the owner. After the admissions, they pursued their courses and got the degrees. The complainant got her university certificate verified by the university on 25.04.2012. Then, the complainant applied for the post of Assistant Employment Officer on 31.01.2013 and got selected for it.

On 07.05.2016 she lodged a General Diary Report and applied for a duplicate certificate as she had lost her certificate. The complainant, after full filling all the formalities, got the duplicate certificate. According to the complainant, the degree is fake and the university has done fraud with her by awarding her with a fake degree.

On the complaint made by Ms Mamta, the police started the investigation.

Further investigation

The investigation revealed that the university was awarding fake degrees. 

The petitioners, Munish goel and Anupam Thakur, who worked at the university got arrested and interrogated. The petitioner, Anupam Thakur, used to give away fake degrees and collected the money. It was also discovered that both of  the petitioners transported the records of Manav Bharti University, solan to Rajasthan where another branch of the same university was located.

The petitioner, Munish Goel, also stated that some staff members from Rajasthan branch of the university were shifted to Solan and used to make fake degrees for the university. Some records are still left for recovery as the investigation was sluggish due to the Coronavirus pandemic.

The issue was whether bail should be granted to the petitioners.

Petitioner’s Argument

The counsel for petitioners argued that the petitioners have nothing to do with the case as they were mere workers at the university and were not involved in committing the crime. It also stated that the petitioners are not in the state of hindering the investigation or evidence in any manner. The main culprit and the owner of the university Raj Kumar Rana, has fled and there is nothing to recover from the petitioners. 

All the allegations were against the owner and not the petitioners. The counsel said that the petitioners will abide by the instructions of the court if they get the bail.

Respondent’s Arguments

The counsel for respondents pleaded that the petitioners should not get the bail as they were an active part of the case. It also said that if the petitioners are not under custody, they may disturb the investigation and manipulate evidence.

Court’s Observation 

The investigation is slow due to coronavirus so, the petitioners should not be under custody until the investigation ends. The petitioners are not in the position of tampering the evidence. Also, as of now, custody of the petitioners is not relevant to the police.

Court’s Decision

The court decided that the petitioners will get the bail. However the petitioners have to adhere to the conditions ordered by the court for the bail.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -