Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Case of Alleged Forging of COVID E-Passes

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The petitioner allegedly forged COVID E-passes and entered a restricted area. The Police arrested him under the Disaster Management Act and Indian Penal Code. This particular offence fell under the category of non-bailable offences. He then filed for anticipatory bail, which the Court approved. This order had been passed on 12th June.

Facts of the Case

In the present case, the Petitioner allegedly forged a COVID E-pass and travelled to a restricted area. The Police arrested the Petitioner under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The charges were filed in compliance with sections 419, 420, 464, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Offences falling within the above sections are categorised as non-bailable offences. The petitioner then filed an application for anticipatory bail. Also, the Court is yet to receive the status report of the case from the police.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The learned counsel for the Petitioner claims that the Petitioner is innocent. They contended that if bail is granted, there will not be any tampering of evidence by the Petitioner. The Counsel assured the Court that the party will be available for the investigation and would not abscond. Further, the petitioner submitted that he did not have a prior criminal record.

Respondent’s Arguments

The learned counsel submitted that the offence is serious in nature. Further, the act is non-bailable as per the Indian Penal Code. Additionally, if the petitioner receives bail, the Court should impose stringent conditions.

Court’s observation 

The Court observed that the Petitioner could not abscond as he was a permanent resident of the village. Hence, this acted as security for his presence before the Court. The Court observed that his custody will not serve any purpose until the State filed a response. The Court also noted that the petitioner did not have a criminal record. 

Court’s judgement

The Court granted bail to the Petitioner. The Court ordered the Petitioner to follow all the conditions imposed on him. The Bench set the bail bond at Rs.10,000 and enumerated ten conditions for his bail. The Court ordered the petitioner not to disturb the investigation or tamper with evidence. If the petitioner failed to follow any of the conditions, his bail would stand dismissed. The Court further ordered the Petitioner to co-operate with the Investigation.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -