Himachal Pradesh High Court Issues a Writ of Mandamus for Conferment of Work-Charge Status of Beldar

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

The Petitioner filed the present petition for two reliefs relating to his employment. Firstly for conferment of work charge status, and secondly for regularisation of his work. The Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to grant the same.

Facts of the case

The Petitioner worked as a Beldar for the Respondent’s organisation. He began in July 1986, and worked until January 1989, with sporadic breaks.

The organisation cleared him from services from 1989 onwards. Due to this, the petitioner filed a claim petition under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act to re-engage him.

The Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court rejected this petition in 2008. The petitioner then approached the High Court in 2009.  The Court allowed the petition and overruled the Lower Court’s judgement in 2012. The organisation re-engaged the petitioner with continuity and seniority in 2013.

However, the Respondent did not extend relief of grant of work charge status to the Petitioner. As the Apex Court laid down the law in the Mool Raj Upadhyay case, the Petitioner approached the Court again. He then filed a petition praying for reliefs as per the Apex Court’s decision in the above case.

Arguments by the Petitioner

The petitioner prayed for two main reliefs. First, the petitioner prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus. This would direct the Respondents to consider the petitioner as a Beldar from 1992.  The Petitioner argued that the Court must grant him work-charge status in compliance with the Mool Raj Upadhaya case. 

The Petitioner also prayed that the Court should take into consideration the case for regularisation as per the government’s policies. During the pendency of the petition, the Petitioner was regularised. Thus, the Petitioner prayed only for the issuance of work charge status.

Arguments by the Respondent

The Respondents stated that they had re-engaged the Petitioner.  Also, they had already sent the case for conferment of work charge status to the government. They clarified that there was no decision on the same.

The Respondents also submitted that regularisation depended on vacancies in the organisation. They claimed that they regularised the Petitioner following a vacancy.

The Respondents agreed that the Petitioner was entitled to the work charge status.  They agreed that the Court must rule the petition in favour of the Petitioner.

Court’s Judgment

After hearing both parties, the Court allowed the Petitioner’s plea.  The Court directed the Respondents to grant work charge status within four weeks. Any benefits consequential to the conferment of the status will be restricted.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -