Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Accused Persons Arrested for Allegedly Selling the Government Supply of Cement to a Private Buyer

Must Read

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Follow us

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail from the Court. The police arrested the petitioners for allegedly selling the government supply of cement to a private buyer. However, this cement was not for sale. Impliedly, the charges imposed on the petitioners were of corruption. In this case, the Court held the petitioners and the case as fit for bail.

Brief Facts of the Case

One of the petitioners, Anil, worked as a government contractor. He received some bags of cement for some official government work. This supply of cement was diverted to another petitioner, Sudesh Kumari. At that time, Sudesh Kumari had ongoing construction work. As she required cement for the same, she entered into a contract with Anil. Moreover, she made a payment of rupees one lakh and fifty thousand towards the same.

The petitioner’s brother-in-law Sanjay Kumar was likewise a part of the contract. He is also one of the said petitioners in this case. He was responsible for giving the contract for the cement to Anil. Moreover, Sanjay instructed the contractor to move the cement to two different locations. The bags were kept in a tin shed near the construction work and in a room of a temple.

Subsequently, the police received information about this dealing. The cement was the property of the government. As it was being used for unlawful private development, the police raided the site. Further, the police found the bags of cement along with some extra cement bags from the temple and the tin shed.

An FIR was filed against the petitioners, for charges of corruption. They were later arrested on the same.  The charges filed were under both Corruption laws, as well as, the Indian Penal Code. (Note: Sections 4 and 7 of The Himachal Pradesh Prevention of Specific Corrupt Practices Act and under Sections 409, 120 IPC). The petitioners filed for anticipatory bail before the Court. The petition was filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The police are yet to find the source of the extra bags of cement.

Arguments Made by the Petitioner

The counsel for the petitioner claimed the petitioners to be innocent. The counsel further argued that the cases were false and that the charges were forced upon them.

As the petitioners are local residents of the village, they cannot abscond. Further, they assured that they will not hinder or manipulate the investigation. The petitioners were already cooperating with the investigation at the time. The counsel stated that the petitioners’ custody did not serve any purpose. Hence, on these grounds, the petitioners should get the bail.

Arguments Made by the Respondent

The counsel for the respondents argued against the grounds made by the petitioners. They expressed that the candidates will abscond if the bail is granted. Further, the counsel argued that they are likely to tamper with the evidence. Thus, the Court should dismiss the appeal.

Observation Made by the Court

The Court observed that petitioners are not in a situation to influence the investigation. Further, the petitioners resided in the district. Thus, they are not likely to escape. Moreover, there is nothing with the petitioners that required recovery by the police. Hence, as there was no productive reason for their custody, the Court can discharge them on a bail.

Court’s Judgment

The Court deemed the case as fit for granting bail. The Court found that petitioners’ bail would not affect the investigation. It also noted that the petitioners’ custody did not serve any purpose. Thus, the Court granted bail.

Further, the Court ordered the petitioners to adhere to orders of the Court. The Court ordered them not to leave the country without prior permission. They should not tamper the evidence and be present when required.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -