Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to a Repeat Offender Under NDPS Act

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

In the present case, the petitioner was allegedly involved in the illegal possession of narcotics. As a result, an FIR was filed by the Police. The petitioner was then arrested under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act. He was also charged under the Motor Vehicle Act. Subsequently, the petitioner prayed for regular bail. After assessing the circumstances, the court granted the bail.

Brief facts of the Case

On 2 June 2020, the police launched an FIR against the petitioner. The police booked the petitioner under section 21 of the Narcotic, Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act. The charges filed were due to his alleged possession of an intermediate quantity of intoxicating capsules. The petitioner was also booked under Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 

As per the status report filed, the police caught Yusuf, whilst he was carrying capsules along with him. Further, the procedure of arrest complied with sec 42(2) of the NDPS Act.  The police received information from reliable sources. They moved to nab the accused before he fled.

Further, after catching Yusuf, the police searched his person and his two-wheeler. The police found that the petitioner was carrying the 191.520 gms. of capsules having 50gm of Tramadol per capsules. The capsules contained neutral powder amounting to 161.280 gms of total powder.

The petitioner did not submit any license for possessing and carrying the same. Thus, the police arrested him,  and he has been in custody. Subsequently, he prayed for regular bail under section 439 of CrPC. According to the status report, the petitioner has a similar criminal history. In 2015, the police caught him with 650 gms of Poppy Straw and 28 gms of Cannabis. The Court has not given any judgement on the case yet. Further, the Court rejected a bail petition for this case at a prior time. This was done, considering the gravity, severity and circumstances of the case and records. 

Petitioner’s Argument

The petitioner stated that he has been falsely accused. He further stated that the investigation of the case is complete and he has been in custody for a long time. With regards to his prior criminal record, he expressed that the quantity found was ”small”. He also assured the Court that he will not influence the investigation in any manner if he is granted bail.

Respondent’s Argument

The respondent heavily mentioned the petitioner’s previous criminal history. He regarded the offences committed as having harmful effects on society. He further argued that if bail is granted, the petitioner will tamper the investigation. 

Observations of the Court

The Court referred to a precedent given by the Supreme Court which deliberated on a similar dispute of determining the quantity of the intoxicants to charge the petitioner with relevant sections of NDPS Act. 

The Court quoted the case of Hira Singh Vs. Union of India. It held that in a mixture of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substance, the neutral substance should also be included while measuring the total weight for considering it under a specific quantity under the act. The accused must be charged accordingly. 

Following the aforesaid observation, the Court held the quantity of the capsules to be of intermediate quantity. Thus, no rigorous section or Section 37 of the Act will apply in this case. The Court further observed that the case is fit for bail. It regarded the petitioner’s custody as not beneficial. The Court also observed that the petitioner has been fined with a challan. He is not in a situation to flee from justice or influence the trial. If the petitioner tries to cross any of the conditions, the Court will cancel his bail. 

Court’s Judgment

Based on the aforesaid observations, the Court passed an order, granting bail. The petitioner has to adhere to the conditions when out in bail. First, the petitioner has to cooperate with the investigation as and when required. Second, the petitioner shall not hinder evidence or hamper the investigation. Third, he cannot leave the country. Lastly, the Court has to be kept updated about his whereabouts.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -