Parnika Sharma

The petitioner filed a plea for transferring her case from one District Court to another. The case pending before the Court was of a divorce petition. The reason was the difficulties faced by her in reaching the court, as she lived far away. The court accepted her plea and allowed

The petitioners sought anticipatory bail from the Court. The police arrested the petitioners for allegedly selling the government supply of cement to a private buyer. However, this cement was not for sale. Impliedly, the charges imposed on the petitioners were of corruption. In this case, the Court held the petitioners

In this case, the accused filed a bail petition before the High Court. The accused was charged under the Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Court granted interim bail to the petitioner, as he was not eligible for a normal or instant bail. Thus, the

In the case of Reena Verma vs State of Himachal Pradesh, the Petitioner prayed for directions for her inclusion in Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules of 1972. The Court allowed the plea. The Court opined that the Petitioner should not suffer due to administrative inefficiency. Brief Facts of the Case

In this case, the petitioners filed a petition against the ruling made by the lower Court.  The ruling allowed the respondents to claim higher compensation. As the government acquired the land for a dam project, the Court affirmed the enhancement. Thus, the Court rejected the Petitioner’s plea. Facts of the

In the case of Veero Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh, the petitioner had filed for bail due to the pandemic. She was under the custody for alleged possession of heroin. The Court granted the bail in view of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Facts of the case A police party, while

The Petitioner filed the present petition for two reliefs relating to his employment. Firstly for conferment of work charge status, and secondly for regularisation of his work. The Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to grant the same. Facts of the case The Petitioner worked as a Beldar

The petitioner allegedly forged COVID E-passes and entered a restricted area. The Police arrested him under the Disaster Management Act and Indian Penal Code. This particular offence fell under the category of non-bailable offences. He then filed for anticipatory bail, which the Court approved. This order had been passed on

In the case of Prem Raj vs State of Himachal Pradesh the petitioner was arrested for possession of 107 grams of hashish. He applied for regular bail in 2019 but couldn’t get it due to delays. Now, the petitioner, after being in custody for one year and nine months, got

In the case of Anupam Thakur and others vs the State of Himachal Pradesh, a bail application was filed by the petitioners, who got arrested for being involved in a case of awarding fake degrees by a university. The bail was granted by the court after concluding that the petitioners