Threat to Democracy in India, Harm to the Freedom of Speech and Expression

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

We live in a democratic nation. Abraham Lincoln has described democracy. He said, “Democracy is the Government of the people, for the people and by the people.” Being a democratic country, the citizens of India are guaranteed certain Fundamental Rights. Part III of our Constitution guarantees this. For a democracy to work, it is people should have a voice, an opinion and the power to express them. However, freedom without a restriction is also a bane. So, while to maintain the balance our Constitution makers inserted Article 19(1)(a). It gives the Freedom of Speech and Expression. Article 19(2) lays down the restrictions on this freedom. Theoretically, we have struck a perfect balance. However, striking the same balance in practice is what we are far from.

Legal Analysis

The author tries to analyze the conflict between theory and practice. This article highlights the contrasts that exist in our democracy.

Freedom of Press vis-a-vis Media Trials

Freedom of Speech and Expression guarantees the freedom to express one’s opinion. This may be in any form, be it written or verbal. This right is available only to the citizens of India. But, it is not an absolute right. The Government of India can impose restrictions on it. The restrictions should be justifiable, reasonable and in line with the Constitutional principles. The Government derives it is the power to impose restrictions from Article 19(2).

Judiciary has played a vital role in enhancing the scope of Freedom of Speech and Expression in India. For instance, the Constitution does not specify the Freedom of Press. The freedom of Press became a part of our Constitution in spirit by way of judicial activism. This is because the Press is the fourth pillar of democracy. 

It plays a vital role in the formation of public opinion. They are essential for the democratic machinery as held in the case of Indian Express v. Union of India. This also means that they have a duty not to mislead the public. 

There is a classic imbalance seen between Freedom of Press and the concept of Media Trials. Freedom guarantees the media to report the court proceedings. But, media trials act as a bane to this freedom. Media trials influence the public minds and disrupt the administration of justice. Moreover, misreporting of judgements by the media personnel has been a rampant issue, causing social unrest.

Freedom of Expression on the Internet

The Internet has become an essential part of our lives. Be it connecting us to the world, sharing our views and so on. However, it has also become a bane for a few individuals. Recently, a stand-up comedy video went viral on the Internet. The stand-up comedian quoted a Quora post that spoke about Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. The girl was not only hurled with abuses over the Internet but also received rape threats. Not only this, but certain politicians also took a stance that she should be arrested. 

The whole controversy became a political and religious agenda. This was not what it was set out for. Not only the comedian but the organizers of the show were asked to shut down their premises. Their property was also damaged. The comedian Agrima Joshua apologized for her joke. 

Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, but to what extent. Here, there is a conflict between someone’s expression and someone’s religious beliefs. However, it is not justified to give rape threats to a woman under any circumstances. That is precisely why the restrictions are essential. It is also not justified to vandalize premises. We are a country that still has its law machinery intact. The Police arrested the person who posted a YouTube video giving rape threats. Such news comes as an assurance. 

Freedom of Speech and Dissent

“Dissent is the safety valve of Democracy” ~ Supreme Court of India.

Dissent is the truest essence of democracy. It means raising your voice for something unjust. Something that you do not agree to. Something that you will not allow. Dissent comes at a considerable cost in a democracy. 

An example of dissent is the Anti-CAA and Anti- NRC protests. Active Indians came together to protest against the law. But, there have always been hurdles in this path. The protestors were killed. Few of them were arrested and jailed, even during the nationwide lockdown. They were charged for making inflammatory speeches, rioting, obstructing public officials in their function and so on. Even the United Nations requested India to free anti-CAA activistsSuch is the State of dissent in India. 

This is a conflict between the State’s duty to maintain law and order and the citizen’s duty to speak against injustice. The ideal situation or solution does not exist. It is only to try and strike a balance to protect our rights. Moreover, law and order are preserved.

In a democracy, such conflicts will keep on arising. It is our duty as a country to devise mechanisms that lead to the least injury of rights if any.

Road Ahead

The State of democracy in India is under threat. These incidents only act as a fair warning. However, we have hope for the youth of the nation. As the youth of the country, we must stand up for what is right and voice it. There are several videos over social media where the public speak out against wrongs.

Thus, this is a sign that we are aware of our rights. It must be our duty to protect democracy and its essence. Education is the key to driving away ignorance. 

The State should also develop mechanisms that promote transparency. It is the lack of transparency that also leads to unrest. They use social media to address Government officials quickly. Nevertheless, it is efficiency is something that has not been proven yet. Some tweets or posts get way out of hand.

They become viral in minutes leading to the formation of polarised public opinions. Moreover, media has an essential role in the process. Reporting the facts without subjective bias is of utmost importance. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -