Death of Pregnant Elephant in Kerala: Perspective through Wildlife Protection Laws

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

Being human is a given. But keeping our humanity is a choice.” – Anonymous

On May 27, 2020, a story surfaced online. It could have been another a piece of news, but it was proof that humanity has now become a lost cause. A pregnant elephant died after eating a pineapple filled with crackers. Official reports suggested that the elephant was not “fed” with the pineapple. Such practices of filling fruits with crackers have been common to scare away wild boars. But, it is still an inhumane thing to do.


The elephant consumed the pineapple and it burst in her mouth. During her postmortem, they found that she was pregnant. This sparked a nationwide debate on animal cruelty laws. People signed around 927 petitions worldwide to get justice for the elephant. The death of an elephant is not something that occurred for the first time. This incident brought to light a scary inhumane side of humans.

Many people worldwide believe in Lord Ganesha. He is a half elephant and half-human god. They believe that every good occasion should begin by chanting his name. It’s ironical that on one hand, we pray to an idol, but on the other hand, become uncompassionate with its origin. The news of the killing of the elephant spread like wildfire. The politicians have used the story for their benefit. There was pressure on the authorities to take quick action against the culprits.

They filed First Information Reports against anonymous accused. On June 5, 2020, the arrest of the first culprit took place. There was lots of social media influence and pressure from all political actors. This led to the Center taking cognizance of the issue. Union Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar assured stern action against the culprits. But, this is not the first time that such an incident has taken place. This is why citizens feel the need for stringent laws against animal cruelty.

Exploring the Legal Aspects in Kerala

In February 2016, Kerala Government passed an order. It allowed the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State to pass on the ownership of illegal captive elephants to people with a certificate. People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) opposed this move. This was a clean chit to the increase of such illegal trading activities.

As per a report in 2019, 133 elephants die in Kerala every year. The Mahesh Rangarajan Commission asked for the establishment of National Elephant Protection Authority. This was to ensure the safety of wild elephants in forests. But, the Kerala Government took no further measures in this aspect.

In June 2019, Kerala Government amended its law about protection of elephants. They did this when the number of elephant deaths reached 34 in 2018. Also, the State took active measures by training mahouts to take better care of elephants. Moreover, they took measures by opening rehabilitation centres for elephants. Furthermore, they allotted ₹108 Crores for the same.

Suparna Ganguly is the President of the Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre. She said that over 70 captive elephants have died at a young age and of unnatural causes. This was only between 2015-2017 in Kerala, Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu.

The death of Soumya, the elephant, became viral on social media. Various animal welfare NGOs came forward. They asked for better laws and treatments for these creatures. PETA India issues a statement bringing out reality. It stated that people kill animals in Kerala to protect crops. This is not the way to maintain ecological balance. The only demand these animal bodies have is the punishment of the culprits. The laws should be stringent and effective.

Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 aims to protect the wildlife of the country. Not only animals but also flora, birds and plant species to ensure an ecological balance. Moreover, Article 48-A of the Indian Constitution also lays emphasis on the role of State to protect its flora and fauna. This is in the form of the Directive Principle of State Policy.

There was a need for this Act because India is not only a land of diverse culture but also diverse species. Such species are vulnerable to predators and can become extinct. The Act provides for the formation of Wildlife Advisory Boards and Chief Wardens. This is for better monitoring and implementation of policies for wildlife protection.

Asian Elephants are listed in Appendix 1 of the United Nations Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species. India is a signatory to this. It guarantees them the utmost protection. But, while enacting the Wildlife Protection Act, there was an exception. This was for elephants in captivity. Many environmentalists state that the exception was not meant to be ongoing.

The animal guaranteed utmost protection by law can remain under private ownership. However, this is truly ironic. This is sheer misuse of the law.

Punishment under the Act

The culprits can face a maximum of 7 years of imprisonment or a fine of ₹25,000 or both. An issue that does not lead to deterrence is the low conviction rates under this Act. For instance, Kerala reported 630 wildlife Offences but only 20 convictions since 2000. Assam Sessions Court set a strong example. It convicted the culprits under Section 51(A) of the Act. It sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for killing mongooses and other birds.

Author’s Recommendations

Above all, the author provides the following recommendations in this regard:

  • Article 51 A(g) of the Constitution also lays down the duties of citizens towards its wildlife.
  • As humans first, we must be empathetic in our approach towards other beings of our ecosystem.
  • As citizens, we must strive to protect India’s diversity in every form.
  • The laws need to be more stringent so that they lead to deterrence in the future. Subsequently, with laws being stringent, we also need proper implementation of these laws.
  • Do not overlook the role of NGOs and Animal Welfare committees.
  • They can work with the State as well as Central Government to help frame better policies. Policies can be tailor-made and implemented in a better way with helping each other.
  • Citizens should play an active part. One must not allow any kind of animal abuse and report such culprits to the authorities. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -