Counterfeit Currency Scam in Pune: Understanding the Legal Aspects

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

On June 10, 2020, six people in Pune were arrested for scamming people with fake notes. The counterfeit notes included not only Indian Rupees but also the American Dollar. Sources say that the notes totalled around ₹87 Crores.

Officials stated that the planning for this scam began during demonetization in 2016. Most of the notes had “Children’s Bank of India” printed on them. In addition to this, the notes seized included notes of denomination of ₹1000. However, they have been out of circulation for the past four years.

This isn’t the first time India has faced the issue of Fake Indian Currency Note (FICN) circulation. There are reports of such incidents almost every year. According to the National Crime Records Bureau ₹2000 notes comprised of 56% of the fake notes seized in India after demonetization.

Moreover, reports for 2017-2018 stated that they seized counterfeit money worth ₹46 Crores. Of this, Gujarat reported the highest numbers of counterfeit currency notes in 2017.

What are the Legal Aspects of Counterfeiting Currency?

Such offences are punishable under the Indian Penal Code from Sections 498-A to 498-E.

Section 498-A

Under this section, a person is liable if he counterfeits currency notes or banknotes. The point to note is that the person is doing so knowingly, hence involving mens rea. The offenders can get imprisoned for life or a term extending up to ten years and with a fine.

Section 498-B

Under this section, any person who uses such counterfeit currency as genuine currency with the knowledge that such currency is counterfeit will be punished. As a result, they can get imprisonment for life or a term that extends up to ten years and also a fine.

Section 498-C

This section talks about the possession of counterfeit currency. The person must know that it is counterfeit. The person must have an intention to use the counterfeit currency as a genuine one. Its punishment can extend up to seven years in prison or a fine or both.

Section 498-D

Any person who possesses the material or instruments with the knowledge to make such counterfeit notes will be punished. They can get imprisonment for life or a term that extends up to ten years and will be liable to pay a fine.

Section 498-E

This Section is further divided into three subsections. Under Subsection (1), if any person makes or delivers another any document that resembles currency notes, with a resemblance that can deceive the receiver of such currency or document to believe that it is not counterfeit, he/she shall be punished with a fine of ₹100.

Under Subsection (2), if the names of any person appear on such a document as mentioned above, they have to be answerable to the Police. The Police are to ask whereabouts like the name and address of the person who made the document. However, if the person in possession of such a document fails to answer the Police, they can be liable for a fine up to ₹200.

Under Subsection (3), if the name of a person appears on any documents as mentioned under subsection (1), he shall be held liable for the same unless the contrary is proven. Hence, the Police will presume that the person in possession is the one who indulged in counterfeiting unless the contrary is proven.

How Can Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Help?

Note: This Act is not applicable in the present case. This paragraph is only intended for educational purposes.

  • This Act will only be applicable counterfeiting is done for financing terrorist activities. 
  • Furthermore, the Central Government has the authority to declare an association unlawful. It has this power under Section 3 of the Act. 
  • Funding such terrorist organizations can lead to imprisonment of up to five years. It can extend up to life imprisonment along with a fine as per Section 17.

What does the Road Ahead Seem Like? is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -