Counterfeit Currency Scam in Pune: Understanding the Legal Aspects

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

On June 10, 2020, six people in Pune were arrested for scamming people with fake notes. The counterfeit notes included not only Indian Rupees but also the American Dollar. Sources say that the notes totalled around ₹87 Crores.

Officials stated that the planning for this scam began during demonetization in 2016. Most of the notes had “Children’s Bank of India” printed on them. In addition to this, the notes seized included notes of denomination of ₹1000. However, they have been out of circulation for the past four years.

This isn’t the first time India has faced the issue of Fake Indian Currency Note (FICN) circulation. There are reports of such incidents almost every year. According to the National Crime Records Bureau ₹2000 notes comprised of 56% of the fake notes seized in India after demonetization.

Moreover, reports for 2017-2018 stated that they seized counterfeit money worth ₹46 Crores. Of this, Gujarat reported the highest numbers of counterfeit currency notes in 2017.

What are the Legal Aspects of Counterfeiting Currency?

Such offences are punishable under the Indian Penal Code from Sections 498-A to 498-E.

Section 498-A

Under this section, a person is liable if he counterfeits currency notes or banknotes. The point to note is that the person is doing so knowingly, hence involving mens rea. The offenders can get imprisoned for life or a term extending up to ten years and with a fine.

Section 498-B

Under this section, any person who uses such counterfeit currency as genuine currency with the knowledge that such currency is counterfeit will be punished. As a result, they can get imprisonment for life or a term that extends up to ten years and also a fine.

Section 498-C

This section talks about the possession of counterfeit currency. The person must know that it is counterfeit. The person must have an intention to use the counterfeit currency as a genuine one. Its punishment can extend up to seven years in prison or a fine or both.

Section 498-D

Any person who possesses the material or instruments with the knowledge to make such counterfeit notes will be punished. They can get imprisonment for life or a term that extends up to ten years and will be liable to pay a fine.

Section 498-E

This Section is further divided into three subsections. Under Subsection (1), if any person makes or delivers another any document that resembles currency notes, with a resemblance that can deceive the receiver of such currency or document to believe that it is not counterfeit, he/she shall be punished with a fine of ₹100.

Under Subsection (2), if the names of any person appear on such a document as mentioned above, they have to be answerable to the Police. The Police are to ask whereabouts like the name and address of the person who made the document. However, if the person in possession of such a document fails to answer the Police, they can be liable for a fine up to ₹200.

Under Subsection (3), if the name of a person appears on any documents as mentioned under subsection (1), he shall be held liable for the same unless the contrary is proven. Hence, the Police will presume that the person in possession is the one who indulged in counterfeiting unless the contrary is proven.

How Can Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Help?

Note: This Act is not applicable in the present case. This paragraph is only intended for educational purposes.

  • This Act will only be applicable counterfeiting is done for financing terrorist activities. 
  • Furthermore, the Central Government has the authority to declare an association unlawful. It has this power under Section 3 of the Act. 
  • Funding such terrorist organizations can lead to imprisonment of up to five years. It can extend up to life imprisonment along with a fine as per Section 17.

What does the Road Ahead Seem Like?


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -