The OTT Code: Streaming Now

Must Read

An Analysis of the Supreme Court of India’s Decision in Saurav Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh on Reservation

Reservation is one of the debatable realities of Indian constitution. This system got its roots from the exploitations due...

Explained: The Political Crisis in Nepal

On December 20th, K P Sharma Oli, the Prime Minister of Nepal dissolved the Lower House Parliament of the...

Can the Relatives of the Husband Attract Prosecution in Case of Triple Talaq?

The Supreme Court of India has recently made a judgement. It lays down that the relatives of the husband...

Explained: The Right to be Forgotten in India

Right to Privacy is an essential fundamental right which has been enshrined in the Indian Constitution under Article 21...

How will the New WhatsApp Privacy Policy Affect Us?

On January 4, 2020, the California based tech giant WhatsApp announced its new privacy law. It allows data integration...

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

Follow us

OTT platforms are gaining immense popularity in India. With the increase in popularity, a need to regulate them was felt. How will this regulation code play in the future? Let us look into it.

Introduction

Over the Top Platforms or OTTs have seeped their way into our daily lives. There’s no denying that they are a go-to thing for almost every age group! They have given a tough competition to the mainstream mediums of entertainment like Television. With their ever-growing popularity, they are all set to grow at a CAGR of 21.82% to reach Rs. 11,977 crore by 2023.

One of the primary reasons for their growth is the variation of content to pick and choose from. This indeed makes the Consumer feel like an important individual and in the power of making his/her own choice. However, the OTT platforms were asked to regulate themselves in terms of censorship, content, and grievance redressal mechanism by the Government. A 100 days ultimatum period was given to the platforms to come up with a code of conduct. Owing to this ultimatum, 15 OTT Platforms signed a self-regulation code.

However, what will be a matter of discussion is the playout of this code in the future and the repercussions thereof.

The Legal Perspective

The Information and Broadcast Minister held a meeting on 2nd March 2020 and asked the OTT platforms to regulate themselves. This was because of various contentions about the content being streamed on these platforms. To solve this issue, the Internet and Mobile Association of India drafted a Code called “Code of best practices for online curated content providers” in January 2019. The code proposed a formation of the Digital Content Complaint Council (DCCC), an adjudicatory body that will look into the complaints against the OTT players.

The code laid down that the content shouldn’t be disrespectful towards the national flag or emblem. Shouldn’t sexually represent a child, shouldn’t be outrageous deliberately towards any community. Shouldn’t promote terrorism and should be consistent with the laws of the country.  The code did not outline the penalties, which is why a new draft was made.

Freedom being restricted?

There’s a strong argument that the self-regulation code is indeed a way to limit freedom of speech and expression. The Indian Constitution guarantees this freedom to every individual. Although not complete, with certain restrictions. However, the move by the Government to give an ultimatum to these OTT players can be construed as a way to suppress individual voices.

The Gen-Z or the current population prefers OTT because of the way and manner in which content is presented. It is considered to be less restricted than our Television shows, in the Indian Context.

This should be seen more in the societal perspective as well. Indian shows that are aired on Television are usually suited for family watching. Television is a medium of connection between families. OTT platforms, on the other hand, have content that may not be best suited for family watching. Censorship in OTT might solve this issue. However, certain stories need to be told; certain truths need to be spoken. It will only be a matter of time to see how the code affects the bold content present on the platforms.

Presence of other laws

Before the existence of this code, other laws were indirectly regulating the content. Laws like the Information Technology Act, Indian Penal Code, Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, and the like. The code is a special law that will direct cover any violation done. But, the need for the code was not felt as much. The media have also highlighted discontent from various owners. They think it’s imposing a rather unfair restriction on their freedom to tell stories. However, this code will lead to faster grievance redressal and enhanced viewing experience for all age groups.

Road Ahead

India’s code is not as comprehensive. It leaves the ground for vagueness and loopholes. This can work either for the benefit of the signatories or against them as well. The code adopted in Singapore (you can read it here) on the other hand, is a much more comprehensive and detailed code. It not only talks about content streamlining but also covers aspects like advertising. It further defines various concepts like horror, nudity, depiction, and the like. The code further lays down the rating criteria for each of the separate categories.

The discontent over the code is evident. The signatories still feel it’s an attempt to limit their freedom. Looking at it from the Government’s perspective, it is done to regulate and streamline the providers for better and age-appropriate viewing.

The code provides for a quick redressal system which will work in favour of both consumers and providers. The code will help the providers to assess their content and provide for better content. It will keep them on their toes! This code shouldn’t come as the Government’s extreme check on the content. It should still give the OTT players the freedom they deserve. It is only a matter of time to understand the implications of the code.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -