Madras High Court Orders Probe From CB-CID in Wake of Writ Petitions Filed by Aggrieved Students Against Directorate of Medical Examination and Self-Financing College Officials

Must Read

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Directs Registry to Accept Original Demand Draft Without Mentioning the Account Number Therein

Extract  The bail application was filed under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Fact In this...

Hong Kong High Court Rules for Independent Mechanisms To Be Set up To Deal With Complaints Against Police Officers

The present suit was brought by a journalist association because of the police brutality that the protestors faced in...

Supreme Court Orders Airtel, Idea, and Vodafone to Disclose Details of Tariff Offers to TRAI

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court was headed by Chief Justice S.A Bobde. It was stated that the...

Juveniles in Care Homes: A Comparative and Critical Analysis

It was the year 1989 when the entire world was undergoing certain changes and in the backdrop of such...

Supreme Court Lays Down Law For The Precise Time For Publication Of E-Gazette For Determining The Enforceability Of The Notifications

On September 23, a three-judge bench of SC held that a notification under Section 8A(1) of the Customs Tariff...

Follow us


The Madras High Court expressed heightened worry observing the attitude of the Directorate of Medical Examination and Self-financing college officials. It came in the wake of a series of Writ Petitions filed by the students, who despite were denied/left out of the allotment of seats for the course accrued to their merit, for not-so-effective handling of the officials concerned. The cases were heard by Justice N. Anand Venkatesh. The Court also issued ordered a probe by CB- CID into ‘conspiracy’ if any, among the officials concerned. 

Facts of the Case

In W.P.No.11963 of 22020, the Petitioner had submitted that she was allotted MD Micro Biology course during the first round of counselling under the Management Quota in PSG Institute of Medical Science and Research, Coimbatore. 

She submitted that the allotment order itself provided for up-gradation of better choice during further counselling, however, the mop-up counselling was not conducted. Thus, the College went ahead and allotted the seat in favour of a candidate who had secured lesser marks than her.

In W.P.No.13466 of 2020, the Karpaga Vinayakka Medical College, Chengalpattu, refused to admit the Petitioner despite him being allotted a seat in the said college after he failed to pay the exorbitant fees. 

On 30.08.20, he paid a sum of Rs. 30.000/- by way of Demand Draft before the selection committee. When he approached the College and produced the provisional allotment order the following day, the College demanded a sum of Rs. 35,000/- as against 30,000/- which was the original fee. 

In W.P. No. 13564 of 2020, the Petitioner did not get any seat during the first and second rounds of counselling. He expected the selection committee to conduct mop-up counselling to fill up the Management Quota. Since the same did not take place, he approached the Court to direct the selection committee to conduct the mop-up counselling. By then, the cut-off date i.e. 31.08.2020 had passed.

Arguments Before the Court

In W.P.No.11963 of 2020, the Petitioner submitted based on the facts mentioned, that directions be given to the Respondent authorities to fill up the PG Medical seats declared as vacant as per the seat matrix published by the Directorate of Medical Education, only by conducting Mop Up counselling for management seats for this year.

The Advocate General, appearing for the Respondent authorities, submitted that there were 103 seats available under the Management Quota. Since there was no time to conduct the counselling, the selection committee wrote a letter to the self-financing colleges to fill up the vacancies from the list forwarded to them. 

Accordingly, the College also submitted that it was not able to allot a seat to the Petitioner as they had to only go by the list issued by the Selection Committee. If the Petitioner was allotted a seat, the seat occupied by her in MD Micro Biology would have fallen vacant. 

In W.P.No.13466 of 2020, the petitioner questioned the College’s change in position concerning the Rs. 5,000/- increase in fees. 

Court’s Observations

In W.P.No.11963 of 2020, the Court inquired why the college had not approached the Supreme Court seeking an extension of time to conduct the mop-up counselling for the Management Quota. The College submitted that the Apex Court had previously extended the time from 31.05.2020 to 31.07.2020 and thereafter, to 31.08.2020. Thus, it was thought that the Supreme Court would not grant any further extension of time to conduct the mop-up counselling. The Court was, however, unconvinced by the College’s response. 

In W.P.No.13466 of 2020, the Court observed that the Respondent college ought to have informed the Selection Committee about the non-payment of the fees by the Petitioner. Thereafter, the Selection Committee should have identified the seat as a stray vacancy and only then the said seat could have been filed. 

In W.P. No. 13564 of 2020, the Court observed that no further action could be passed, as the deadline for conducting the mop-up counselling for Management Quota was already over i.e., on 31.08.20. 

Court’s Decision

In W.P. No. 11963, the Court gave the liberty to the Petitioner to give up her seat in PSG Institute of Medical Science and Research in MD Micro Biology, without the imposition of any penalty, as observed under 21 (c) of the Prospectus. Further, it ordered that the Petitioner will be entitled to once again participate during selection in the next academic year for post-graduation courses. 

In W.P. No. 13466 of 2020, the Court directed the Petitioner to pay the fees fixed by the fee fixation committee to the Respondent college. On such payment, the Respondent college shall admit the Petitioner in the MS Orthopaedics course. It was further directed that the Respondent college should refund the entire amount received from the candidate who was admitted in the place of the Petitioner. 

The Court directed the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, to allot the case to CB- CID which shall consist of a team headed by an officer, not below the rank of an Assistant Commissioner. The scope of the enquiry as mentioned by the Court would be related to the following issues.

Firstly, whether there was any conspiracy between the officials of the Directorate of Medical Education and the self-financing colleges in filling up the stray vacancies on 31.08.2020. Secondly, the amount received from each candidate who was admitted by the self-financing colleges on 31.08.2020. Thirdly, any other matter that may unfold during investigation in this regard.

The Court lastly directed that the Report of this aforementioned investigation titled “For Reporting Compliance”, must be presented before the Court on or before 31.01.2021. The Writ Petitions were thus, disposed of. 

To view the original judgment, click here. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Affirms Decision Passed by the High Court in the Case of Jayantilal Verma V. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)

The appellant filed this appeal before the Supreme Court against the judgment passed by the High Court, convicting the appellant herein for the offences...

Telangana High Court Pulls up State Government Over COVID Test Numbers

Telangana High Court on 19.11.2020, warned the State Government to be wary of the second wave of COVID-19 and directed it to step up...

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment of Kerala High Court, Reduces the Sentence and Compensation of the Appellants

The criminal appeal was filed by the accused, aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence also the judgment in a criminal appeal, passed...

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -