Writ Petition Filed in Madras HC Over Temple’s Encroachment of Water Body

Must Read

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Follow us

A Writ Petition styled as a Public Interest Litigation was filed by the Petitioner Arunkumar against the District Collector of Madurai under Article 226. It seeks to remove the encroachment made by the respondent in Kalungu area (outlet) of Illangiyendal Village, Madurai District based on the petitioner’s representation dated 26.05.2020. The case was heard by the Division Bench Judges of M. Sathyanarayanan and P. Rajmanickam.

Facts of the Case

The Illangiyendal Tank/Water Body is situated in S.F. No. 31, Illangiyendal Village and it is the main irrigation source of agriculture as well as for the nearby residents and it is being maintained by the third respondent – The Executive Officer. The petitioner further contended that the water body as well as its waterways are under encroachment and in this regard, representation dated 26.05.2020 was made to the concerned officials of the respondents. Despite the receipt and acknowledgement of the same, no action whatsoever is taken and therefore, the petitioner feels constrained to approach this Court with the Writ Petition. 

Arguments before the Court

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in a portion of the water body in S.F. No.31, there exists a Vazhavanthan Amman Temple. Taxes are being collected to renovate the said temple. In the light of the encroachment made in the waterways, the official respondents are under the statutory obligations to take appropriate action to remove the same and prays for appropriate directions.

The learned special government pleader appearing for the respondents submitted  that the Tahsildar has caused an inspection. The land admeasuring the extent of area in S.F. No. 31 of Illangiyendal Village, Madurai east taluk, Madurai district, Vazhavanthan Amman Temple is in existence. Since the temple is upon a water body, Form – I notice was issued as per Rule 2(1) (e) of Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Rules, 2007. Since, appropriate action has been taken, the petitioner presently may not have any grievance and prays for dismissal of the Writ Petition. 

Court’s Orders

The Court finds that no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. However, the third respondent i.e., The Executive Officer  is directed to take further action in accordance with law by adhering the principles of natural justice. He is to remove the encroachment as expeditiously as possible. The directions must be complied with within 10 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The decision should be communicated to the petitioner as well as the temple authorities.The Writ Petition stands disposed accordingly. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Closed Proceeding in Case of “in Re: Advocate on Record Includes a Proprietary Firm Etc.”

Brief facts of the case Emails from the Petitioner resulted in an administrative decision. An Order of the Supreme Court has drawn up the issue...

Supreme Court To Hear Female Army Officers Plea on Non-Implementation of the Permanent Commission

Claiming that its order granting Permanent Commission to women in the army’s non-combat support units on par with the male counterparts was not implemented well, many Women Army officers have approached the Supreme Court.

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -