Interview with Tanya Shree, Advocate on Record, Supreme Court of India

Must Read

Interview with Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Dean of School of Law, UPES Dehradun

Dr Vijay Kumar Singh is the Dean of the School of Law, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun. He is known for his experience in the field and his will to never stop learning. His journey is quite interesting as he started off as a science student and with time discovered his passion for law. He has served as the Deputy Director in the Competition Commission and also as the Associate Professor and Head of Corporate Law at Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. Dr. Singh was invited as the Member on the Editorial Board of Annual Journal on Competition Law and Policy of Competition Commission of India, SIPI Task Force and Academics Committee of INSOL India, to name a few. He also has written many research papers and has published his work in form of books. In this Interview, Dr Singh discusses his life as a student of law and how he utilizes his experience from those days to help the students of the University. He also discusses his experience of working at different places and provides advice on certain problems commonly faced by students of law.

Interview with Aditya Chopra, Founder and Managing Partner of Victoriam Legalis

Mr. Aditya Chopra is the Founder and Managing Partner of Victoriam Legalis, a law firm that specializes in multi-jurisdictional practice stationed in Mumbai, India. Previously, he co-founded PSL Advocates and Solicitors and SanAd Legal and were later merged. Mr. Chopra has served as Legal Consultant to Mr. Seemanto Roy at Sahara India Pariwar. He has been named as the “Rising Star Under 40, 2020” by LegalEra. With great experience in mooting and an outstanding academic record, Mr. Aditya, in this interview discusses his journey from law school to developing his own style and name in the field.

Interview with Dr. Sagar Suresh Dhole, Senior Counsel at Mastercard, earlier appointed as Welfare Administrator in Office of Director General (Labour Welfare), Ministry of...

Dr. Sagar Suresh Dhole is Senior Counsel at Mastercard. Recommended by the Union Public Service Commission in 2016 and was appointed as “Welfare Administrator” in Office of Director General (Labour Welfare), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India in 2017. He is a Legal, Compliance and Ethics Professional with strategist corporate legal and leadership experience of 12+years in Payment, Banking Technology Service Industries.

Interview with Manav Gecil Thomas, Partner at Thomas George and Associates, Hyderabad

Mr. Manav Gecil Thomas is a name partner at Thomas George and Associates, Hyderabad. He has been a part of the legal profession for over 4-5 years. He deals with a diverse area of litigation matters spread over different kinds of laws practising and appearing before various judicial/quasi-judicial fora starting from the lowest court of jurisdiction to the Supreme Court. He is also known for his experience in non-litigation matters.

Interview with Rajiv Tuli, Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services

Rajiv Tuli is the Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services. Prior to this, he was the managing...

Interview with Ankur Sood, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Ankur Sood is an Independent Advocate dealing with both Civil as well as Criminal Cases before various Courts and...

Follow us

Tanya Shree is an Advocate on Record at the Supreme Court of India. She cleared the Advocate on Record examination in Feb 2020. She started her career in litigation in 2013 by practicing mainly in the Supreme Court of India and Delhi High Court. In 2018, she started working as an Associate at Indian Innovation since its inception on a pro bono basis. She completed BA LLB from Symbiosis Law School, Pune.

Libertatem Magazine interviewed Miss Tanya recently. Here is an extract from the interview of Advocate Tanya Shree

Vidushi: You joined Symbiosis in 2008. Back then, there were very limited Law Schools in India. Did you appear for other NLU Entrance Exams or Symbiosis was your only choice? Back then, what were the deciding factors to choose between limited Law Schools?

Tanya: Coming from a non-lawyer’s background, my interest in law arose during my +2 years. I had given CLAT and SET examination. Back then a total of 8 colleges were allotted through CLAT. The consideration that weighed with students were ranks of the colleges’, with NLSIU, Banglore being the most favored and difficult to get through. Through CLAT counseling I was allotted GNLU, Gujarat. However, I chose Symbi because a lot of my peers and seniors at that point in time told me that Symbi had a lot of opportunities in terms of extra-curricular activities, which are as diverse and as varied one can imagine. I think it’s absolutely true about Symbi as the college provides a unique curriculum wherein apart from academics a lot of emphasis and opportunity is provided to the students by way of extra-curricular activities, which adds to the overall development of law students.

Vidushi: You joined the Bar fresh from Law School. What challenges did you face?

Tanya: I cannot say that joining the bar fresh from Law School was a cakewalk! In my college days, I was an avid mooter and my various internship experience with law firms made me realize that I was not cut-out for a desk job. Therefore, immediately after my graduation, I joined the chambers of an Advocate-on-Record. My major challenge was with the practical side of the law, especially filing procedures, etc. wherein I had to deal with a particularly rude clerk, it was a herculean task to get the work done through him! And one had to try many ways to get the work done through him. The other challenge that I faced was low payment. In litigation, one puts in at least 12 hours of work a day every day for seven days,  even when one is sick and still doesn’t get paid a basic minimum salary. However, the joy of getting relief in matters is unparalleled, especially the first few ones!

Vidushi: Young Lawyers these days face a lot of issues after college if they wish to go for Litigation. One of the most common problems is of no stipend or very little stipend from their employers. They are offered an almost negligible stipend for the hard work they do at the Lawyer’s Chamber. We are always heard that this is one reason which drives many prospective lawyers ways from the work and they eventually are attracted to a decent to higher-paid Law Firm or Corporate Jobs. What is your take on this issue? Do you feel that the young lawyers should be paid at least some decent salary or stipend to at least sustain themselves in a different city?

Tanya: Yes Definitely! At least some respectable salary is a must. A decent salary apart from sustaining you also boosts your confidence. This is one area the litigation offices are to look into and maybe young generation lawyers can show the way.

Vidushi: You have had a remarkable practice of around 7 Years. Have you ever faced situations of moral slippery grounds, cases that caused some ethical turmoil? If yes, then how did you deal with it?

Tanya: In the practice of law, 7 years is nothing! I am still taking baby steps and is very much a student of law. Till now, I have not faced any moral slippery grounds. A lawyer is an Officer of Court and if she/he remembers this always, I don’t think he will ever face moral slippery grounds.

Vidushi: Libertatem.in congratulates you for clearing the Advocate on Record Examination. Can you tell our readers more about the Advocate on Record Examination and when and how should they prepare?

Tanya: Thank you for your warm greetings. Advocate on Record is an annual exam conducted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Lawyers who qualify this exam, are eligible to act, file, and plead on behalf of their clients before Supreme Court. Usually, the exams are conducted at the end of May or the first week of June. There are four papers, which are Practice and Procedure of Supreme Court, Drafting of Petitions of Supreme Court, Advocacy and Professional Ethics, and Leading Cases.

Regarding preparation, it varies from person to person. If you are practicing regularly at Supreme Court, you are already familiar with its practice and procedure and would not require much time. However, as the examination is a written one (and it’s been ages since we have written continuously for three long hours!), it’s advisable to start developing the habit of writing daily. I had started preparing for the exam from May onwards, as from the second week the Court closes and that is the time when you can focus completely on your exams. It required one month of continuous effort to effectively cover the entire syllabus. Apart from going through the study materials thoroughly, discussion with peers and guidance from Seniors also helped me a lot. Anyone needing any assistance in this regard is more than welcome to contact me as it would be an opportunity for me to give back to the bar.

Vidushi: Lastly, what would be your advice to the young students at Law School as well as Law Graduates?

Tanya: Follow your passion! Do multiple internships in various disciplines such as corporate law firms, litigation law firms, NGOs, Advocates, etc. It is by interning at different places that you would know of different aspects and challenges that each workplace has and eventually you will figure out what exactly you want to do. If you love the work that you do, then even arduous work timings will not deter you. For me personally each case comes as a puzzle and like solving puzzles, you won’t bother looking at lengthy judgments and commentaries, in order to find the most suitable solution to your case. While, for someone who does not like litigation, it could be a humungous task to dig through each and every judgment! Therefore, do whatever you want to do, but love it. One more thing that the Law Students and Law Graduates need to keep in mind is law is an ever-evolving subject and it helps to keep oneself abreast with the latest changes in society and its consequent change in law including technological changes.


Recommend an Interview

Recommend an Interview here by filling up the recommendation form.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -