Interview with Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv., Supreme Court of India & Former Solicitor General of India

Must Read

Interview with Dr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Dean of School of Law, UPES Dehradun

Dr Vijay Kumar Singh is the Dean of the School of Law, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun. He is known for his experience in the field and his will to never stop learning. His journey is quite interesting as he started off as a science student and with time discovered his passion for law. He has served as the Deputy Director in the Competition Commission and also as the Associate Professor and Head of Corporate Law at Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs. Dr. Singh was invited as the Member on the Editorial Board of Annual Journal on Competition Law and Policy of Competition Commission of India, SIPI Task Force and Academics Committee of INSOL India, to name a few. He also has written many research papers and has published his work in form of books. In this Interview, Dr Singh discusses his life as a student of law and how he utilizes his experience from those days to help the students of the University. He also discusses his experience of working at different places and provides advice on certain problems commonly faced by students of law.

Interview with Aditya Chopra, Founder and Managing Partner of Victoriam Legalis

Mr. Aditya Chopra is the Founder and Managing Partner of Victoriam Legalis, a law firm that specializes in multi-jurisdictional practice stationed in Mumbai, India. Previously, he co-founded PSL Advocates and Solicitors and SanAd Legal and were later merged. Mr. Chopra has served as Legal Consultant to Mr. Seemanto Roy at Sahara India Pariwar. He has been named as the “Rising Star Under 40, 2020” by LegalEra. With great experience in mooting and an outstanding academic record, Mr. Aditya, in this interview discusses his journey from law school to developing his own style and name in the field.

Interview with Dr. Sagar Suresh Dhole, Senior Counsel at Mastercard, earlier appointed as Welfare Administrator in Office of Director General (Labour Welfare), Ministry of...

Dr. Sagar Suresh Dhole is Senior Counsel at Mastercard. Recommended by the Union Public Service Commission in 2016 and was appointed as “Welfare Administrator” in Office of Director General (Labour Welfare), Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India in 2017. He is a Legal, Compliance and Ethics Professional with strategist corporate legal and leadership experience of 12+years in Payment, Banking Technology Service Industries.

Interview with Manav Gecil Thomas, Partner at Thomas George and Associates, Hyderabad

Mr. Manav Gecil Thomas is a name partner at Thomas George and Associates, Hyderabad. He has been a part of the legal profession for over 4-5 years. He deals with a diverse area of litigation matters spread over different kinds of laws practising and appearing before various judicial/quasi-judicial fora starting from the lowest court of jurisdiction to the Supreme Court. He is also known for his experience in non-litigation matters.

Interview with Rajiv Tuli, Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services

Rajiv Tuli is the Managing Partner of LegalLands and Vaidat Legale Services. Prior to this, he was the managing...

Interview with Ankur Sood, Advocate, Supreme Court of India

Ankur Sood is an Independent Advocate dealing with both Civil as well as Criminal Cases before various Courts and...

Follow us

Mr. Gopal Subramanium is a senior advocate of Supreme Court of India and has served as the Solicitor General of India from 2009- 2011. He started out his career with Mr. Shardul S. Shroff and trained with the likes of Mr. D.P. Wadhwa and Soli Sorabjee.

He has been associated with some of the most significant cases of the country which have shaped the legislative principles of privacy, human rights and freedom of speech internationally. Sir has successfully defended the conviction of the sole surviving terrorist Ajmal Kasab in the 2008 Mumbai Terror attacks. As a part of the JS Verma Commission, he has contributed towards recommendations to amend Indian laws to promote the safety and dignity of women and children.

In 2013 Mr. Subramanium, set up his UK Office after building his name as a leading international commercial arbitrator. In 2015, he was appointed a Supplementary Judge at the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Tribunal. In 2020, he became the first Indian Senior Advocate to appear before the Singapore Court of Appeal.

In this interview, Mr. Subramanium discusses his journey in the legal profession and the dynamic experiences that he has garnered over the years.

Anukriti: How according to you the perspective about law as a profession has changed over the years? Why did you decide to pursue law?

Gopal Subramanium: The legal profession was considered to be a profession of freedom and independence, and one which was designed to secure the rule of law. Over a period of time, it has become more commercially centred around business and industry, as well as regulatory approvals. I became a lawyer because of a promise I made my mother, at the time of my father’s death.

Anukriti: You were one of the youngest lawyers to be designated as a Senior Advocate by the Supreme Court of India. Can you highlight your journey and your experience, especially while working under Mr. Soli Sorabjee and D.P. Wadhwa?

Gopal Subramanium: I first started working with D.P. Wadhwa, who also happened to be a student of my father at the Delhi University. D.P. Wadhwa was an extraordinary role model of humility, perseverance and dignity. Soli Sorabjee is a man of brilliance, deep knowledge, and is very clever at picking up legal points. He would do an internal rehearsal with the opposite argument before finding a solution. He too was a very inspiring and generous senior.

The journey to becoming a senior advocate was possible because there was a mutually resonate moral ethos which was inculcated in me, and the court also respected such an ethos. It was as if the standards had to be matched by both the aspirant and the court simultaneously. This wavelength was textured by purity, candour, dignity, and above all, fairness to the cause of administration of justice.

Anukriti: As the Special Public Prosecutor in the Ajmal Kasab case and several other such cases relating to terrorists attack, what are your personal views about the idea of capital punishment in such cases or generally as well? Organisations like the UN has been generating an international sentiment against Capital Punishments, do you think there can be a better alternative form of punishment in such cases?

Gopal Subramanium: While there is a substantial body of opinion that there should be no capital punishment, it is not inconceivable that cases of extreme terror or crime should be visited with such punishment. Indeed the standard of proof in respect of capital punishment is much higher, and the factors to award that punishment must be so clearly and strongly made out, that no other form of punishment would be appropriate.

We still, therefore, in India have some distance to cover before the abolishment of capital punishment.

Anukriti: The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Bill, 2019 empowers the government to designate even individuals as terrorists. Do you feel it can promote human rights violations to some extent in terms of giving the police the right to bracket any activity as terrorism?

Gopal Subramanium: I have grave reservations about the lawfulness of such a bill.

Anukriti: Due to the COVID-19 situation it has come into light that our judicial system lacks the infrastructure to effectively involve technology into their functioning. What kind of changes according to you can be made to develop a better framework to actually utilise technology to reduce the pendency of cases in India?

Gopal Subramanium: It is not that technology was not being used by the judiciary during COVID-19, but that some courts have been very unsuccessful in using technology. This does require some hand-holding for some sections of the judiciary. There are many things that are procedural in character which can be attended to by technology and does not require a physical presence in courts. To that extent, the workload on the judiciary and judicial time can be considerably diminished.

Anukriti: Out of the numerous number of cases you have been a part of, which one was the most challenging case for you and why?

Gopal Subramanium: It is difficult to say which ones stood out as the most challenging case because I have trained myself to believe each case is a compete for challenge by itself. However constitutional cases have been more challenging and also more rewarding because of the depth of constitutional scholarship belonging to a different plane.

I do believe that before I gave the final address in the parliament attack case, the amount of research and work I had put in is the largest I have done for any case.

Anukriti: A lot of law students do not wish to indulge in the criminal practice of law, considering that the same involves serious questions relating to the moral standards, which the lawyers have to overlook sometimes to support their client. How were you able to keep the moral balance intact while working?

Gopal Subramanium: If the fundamental role of a lawyer is clearly understood there would be no moral dilemma.   A lawyer is not supposed to sit in judgement over his client, he is supposed to do his duty fearlessly for the sake of his client, irrespective of his opinion.

Anukriti: It is usually considered that law as a profession as well as the judicial appointments entail nepotism within their scope. In what way do you think this has affected the integrity of the profession?

Gopal Subramanium: Nothing can affect the integrity of the profession than slanted or extraneous judicial appointments. Even a single vitiated appointment can affect the columns of the judiciary, therefore one must know that the institution while being characterised as strong, can be easily displaced by some bad appointments. Therefore there is a very high level of the constitutional obligation to be discharged in the matter of judicial appointments, which must have no trace of politics in it.

Anukriti: You have established a UK office and have also become the first Indian Senior Advocate to have appeared before the Singapore Court of Appeal. How different according to you is the legal system outside of India? What are the main differences you observed that should be incorporated to improve the existing structure?

Gopal Subramanium: The Singapore Court of Appeal is an outstanding court. This is a court which I would strongly recommend for emulation. The thoroughness, preparation, and the meticulousness of approach of the court and of the lawyers, is absolutely of the topmost ladder.

I have seen certain other jurisdictions also at the same level, but in Singapore, the sustained way in which that presence can be felt is remarkable.

The use of written submissions, carefully prepared memorandum of appeal, and very precise articulation before the court are fundamentally the outstanding features in the Singapore model.

Anukriti: As a person who has recognised the importance of Mental Health and has supported organisations creating awareness about the same, what would be your advice to the aspiring lawyers who are currently under the brunt of the slowed sown economy and lack of job opportunities?

Gopal Subramanium: Mental health is the most important attribute of health, it is in fact even more important than physical health, so the advice I would offer to all young lawyers is to find different forms of being preoccupied in a variety of knowledge learning and skill-based learning acquisitions during this period of slow down. A lawyer is actually a symbol of hope in a society and a lawyer must always keep his chin up.


Recommend an Interview

Recommend an Interview here by filling up the recommendation form.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -