Speaker Withdraws Plea Challenging Rajasthan High Court’s Direction as on July 21 

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

The Bench was informed by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal that the petition relating to the disqualification notice served on Sachin Pilot and 18 other MLAs was being withdrawn. The withdrawal is taking place in light of the order passed by the High Court on July 24.

Facts of the Case 

Speaker of the Rajasthan Assembly CP Joshi has withdrawn his petition before the SC. It challenged the Rajasthan HC order of July 21. The plea was for the case about the disqualification notice served on Sachin Pilot and 18 other MLAs.

A Bench of Justices Arun Mishra, BR Gavai, and others were informed by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal today that the petition was being withdrawn. This was being done in light of the order passed by the High Court on July 24.

Arguments

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal submitted that after the Supreme Court refused to stay the High Court’s order passed on July 21 (The order in question directed the Speaker to take no coercive action). The High Court proceeded to pass a detailed order on July 24.

He said that the order passed on July 21, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present SLP, has merged with the High Court’s later order of July 24. Thus, taking this into consideration the same has resulted in a plea.

Therefore, the SLP was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh SLP, keeping all grounds open.

Court’s Observations

On July 23, a three-judge Bench of the Apex Court had agreed to hear at length the plea filed by the Speaker. The case in question was about disqualification notices served to 19 MLAs. The Court had refused to grant a stay on the High Court order.

Soon after the hearing before the SC, on July 24, the Rajasthan High Court ordered status quo on the disqualification notice. This stay was in favour of the 19 rebels Congress lawmakers, including sacked Deputy Chief Minister Sachin Pilot.

The status quo implies that Speaker Joshi would not be able to proceed further on the show-cause notice which was issued to 19 dissident Congress MLAs on July 14, even if these legislators did not submit their replies.

The HC had also allowed the petition filed by the Pilot camp to add the Union of India as a respondent. This was done in view of the challenge to Para 2(1)(a) of the 10th Schedule of the Constitution of India, which deals with anti-defection.

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker CP Joshi had moved the SC against the order of the Rajasthan HC. The order directed the speaker to refrain from proceeding against rebel MLAs till the High Court pronounces its order.

Decision

It has been stated that the July 21 order, which is the subject matter of challenge in the present SLP, has merged with the HC subsequent order of July 24. 

The plea before the SC has become infructuous. Hence, the SLP was withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh SLP, keeping all grounds open. Thus, in the light of the aforementioned events, the Speaker withdrew his plea before SC.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -