Tablighi Jamaat proves Lockdown & Social Distancing Advisories Does Not Apply to Some Hindus

Must Read

India’s International ‘Retrospective Taxation’ Regime Vis-a-Vis PCA Rulings in Vodafone and Cairn in 2020

The imposition of retrospective taxation of foreign companies doing business in India has been at the helm of controversy...

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Follow us

Sadly, the religious congregation at Nizamuddin proved that the National Lockdown and Social Distancing Advisories apply to Muslims and not to some Hindus factions especially BJP. After CAA NRC Protests, Tablighi Jammat Incident gave National Media exactly what they were looking for, a story to spread hatred towards one specific community. Majority of the National Media distanced themselves from reporting on Madhya Pradesh BJP’s gathering or UP CM Adityanath’s religious ceremony during Lockdown, but, when it Tablighi Jamaat story broke out, it was them, who painted the situation with religious colours. 

The Nizamuddin faction of the Tablighi Jamaat held a religious congregational program in Nizamuddin West, Delhi. There was an Ijtema (congregation) in every week of March till March 21 even when the government of Delhi had prohibited such gatherings from 13th March itself. There was also another violation of rules by foreign speakers including misuse of tourist visa for missionary activities and not taking 14-day home quarantine for travellers from abroad. The entire region of the Markaz and the surrounding areas have been quarantined by the police by 30th of March. After evacuation from the Markaz, of the scores of jamaat attendees, 167 of them were quarantined in a railway facility in South-east Delhi amid concerns over their safety and transmission of the virus. There were further complications after the staff at the quarantine facility reported the Tablighi jamaat followers misbehaved with the staff and spat at the doctors looking after them.

Questions have been raised as to how the Delhi Police and the Government of India allowed this event to proceed in the midst of a pandemic. After these actions were carried out, an FIR was filed against the top leadership of the Jamaat under Section 3 of the Epidemic Disease Act.

As the search continues for identifying the remaining members of Tablighi Jamaat, who had attended the religious congregation at Nazimuddin in New Delhi, the situation remains dire. The incident has become the hotspot of the recent coronavirus outbreak in India, responsible for spawning multiple clusters of the said disease across the nation in various states. As of the writing of this story, 7,600 Indians and 1,300 foreigners have been identified with links to the Islamic missionary group the number is suspected to increase, with hundreds of them being infected of COVID 19 after attending the congregation and reportedly 7 have died due to the complication related to the disease.

This incident has sparked a serious discussion across the nation on how flouting social distancing norms and government laws can lead to serious consequences. In times when the total number of cases around the globe is crossing the 900,000 mark with 47,286 reported deaths with total no. of cases in India reaching 2000, the situation has taken a turn for the worse.

Legal action against Tablighi Jamaat Organizers

FIR has been filed against Maulana Saad, the president of Jamaat along with officials namely Dr. Zeeshan, Mufti Shehzad, M Saifi, Younus, Mohd. Salman and Mohd. Ashraf who were also named as accused. Central Government Standing Counsel Gaurang Kanth has been persuading the Delhi High Court Chief Justice to take suo moto cognizance in Nizamuddin Markaz incident in order to punish those who are responsible. Knath has urged the Court to take direct action against the organisers of the said congregation for endangering the lives of people and aiding the spread of the virus.

The FIR was filed under Sec. 270 (to act malignantly in order to spread a virus dangerous to one’s health) and Sec. 271 (flouting quarantine rule) of the IPC, along with Epidemic Diseases Act and Sec. 269 (negligent activities likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life) against the people responsible.

The accusation has been made against the Jamaat that it has asked its followers to ignore the social distancing norms, which the government had urged the citizens to follow.

Here it should be borne in mind that many who invoke constitution for the enforcement of their rights, and in particular for fair treatment, need to adhere to the constitutional obligations on the part of the citizens. For instance, the right to freedom of religion enshrined in the constitution under Article 25 subject it to public order, morality and health.

Lockdown only applies to Muslims, not to some Hindus

The defenders of the Jamaat, which they have in the public domain, argued that the Jamaat congregation was singled out, whereas incidences of other large-scale gatherings despite being in public knowledge have been ignored. Many reports on social media also pointed out that similar gatherings by people of majority faiths did not attract such prompt attention by authorities. It was claimed that two days after the Tablighi Jamaat congregation, a large number of Hindu pilgrims gathered in Maharashtra’s Sai Baba temple, which, however, remains a rumour.

Days later, in the State of Madhya Pradesh, Shivraj Singh Chouhan of the ruling BJP took an oath as the chief minister surrounded by a large crowd, ignoring Prime Minister Modi’s message of social distancing.

Tablighi Jamaat, Lockdown, Social Distancing
BJP’s Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s sworn in as Madhya Pradesh CM amidst PM Modi’s Social Distancing Advice.

A day after Prime Minister Modi announced the lockdown, the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, had organised a group religious ceremony in Ayodhya town in an apparent violation of lockdown rules.

Tablighi Jamaat, Lockdown, Social Distancing
U.P. Chief Minister Adityanath shifts Ram idol amid lockdown. Despite social distancing protocols, he takes part in an event to move the idol to a temporary structure on March 25, a day after PM Modi announced National Lockdown which apparently does not apply to Yogi Adityanath

The fact remains that the particular incidence worsened corona outbreak in the country which cannot be said in case of other incidences. In times of a great crisis, such lapses invite public anger. Moreover, the willful defiance of the lockdown protocol through acts and statements has only added fuel to the fire.

Many concerned observers have highlighted that there were several lapses on the part of responsible public authorities other than the congregation organisers as well. A very important constitutional edict enshrined as Part IV-A the fundament duties must be followed by one and all. The constitution can guard our rights only when we respect and follow our constitution. In particular, I would like to emphasise the following duties or part of them as they apply in the present context.

To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions…;

It’s the constitution, specifically in the respect of Emergency provisions and in case of crisis expects the citizens to respect the government and local authorities, by following the established norms to deal with the ongoing crisis, in this case being proper social distancing norms and following the lockdown protocol.

To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;

The Constitution calls upon the citizens of the nation to protect the country. In this particular scenario to stay in their homes in order to stop the spread of the virus, which can cause unprecedented casualties, specifically when it comes to the possible loss of life.

To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;

In the aforementioned duty, the constitution calls upon the citizens to put the nation before their individual religion, in the current scenario this can be achieved by stopping public celebration of religious festivals and congregation in order to stop the spread of the virus.

To develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

To not to spread false information among the masses, so as to avoid the creation of panic and hysteria, to believe in logic and science and finally to put the nation before the community.

Laws, constitutional or otherwise, are meant to protect and empower the citizens. The constitutional spirit requires that every citizen fulfils civic responsibilities and perform national duties rather than colouring a particular incident with religious bias and propaganda. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -