Rajasthan High Court Upholds the Classification of Prisoners for Release on Parole

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

The Rajasthan High Court recently upheld the classification of convicts, for the purposes of granting parole, on the basis of the nature and gravity of offenses committed by them.

Brief Facts of the Case 

Decongestion of prisons has been a prime concern of the police forces in recent years. Due to a large number of prisoners, the prison infrastructure is already under pressure. So to meet the requirements paroles and conjugal leaves are granted to prisoners in order to decongest the prisons. In this order, the Rajasthan HC classified convicts, for granting parole, on the basis of the gravity of offenses committed by them.

Arguments Made

The Petitioners had contended that the rule is ultra vires the Constitution, as it gives special parole to only a certain category of prisoners.

It very important to decongest prisons, as the prison system is already under a lot of duress adding to the risk of COVID 19. One of the other reasons mentioned was for the reintegration of prisoners back into society especially those who were convicted of less serious crimes.

However, earlier the Court held that no ground for interference is made out. It may be noted that pursuant to the recommendations made by the High Power Committee, formed in each state as per directions issued by the Supreme Court in In Re: Contagion Of COVID 19 Virus In Prisons, the trend has been to release prisoners who have been convicted for offenses that are punishable with not more than 7 years imprisonment.

Last week, the Bombay HC also dismissed a petition challenging the classification of prisoners by the High-Power Committee. The challenge was the for release on temporary bail and parole.

Court’s Observation

The division bench comprised by Justice Pankaj Bhandari and Justice Narendra Singh made an observation. They observed that special parole can be granted to certain categories of prisoners and if the benefit is not given to those who have been convicted for offenses affecting the State and for grave offenses, such rider cannot be said to be unconstitutional.

Further an observation was made in a writ petition seeking to quash Rule 10-B of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole (Amendment) Rules, 2020. The provision was inserted by the Government to decongest prisons, in view of the impending threat of Covid-19.

As per this Rule, parole may be granted to a category of prisoners in a bid to decongest prisons. Except, those who have been convicted for offenses heinous in nature i.e.
-Acid attack

-Rape (Section 375)

-Dacoity (Section 391)

-Murder

– Section 4 or 6 of the POCSO Act

-Prevention of Money Laundering Act

– Anti-national activities

-Unlawful Activities (Prevention Act) or Offenses of similar nature or the cases investigated by any Central Investigating Agency is included as well.

Court’s Order

The Rajasthan High Court upheld the classification of convicts, for the purposes of granting parole. This was done on the basis of the nature and gravity of offenses committed by them.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -