Rajasthan High Court Permits Rebel Congress MLAs to Move Amendment Plea

Must Read

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Follow us

Rajasthan High Court recently permitted the rebel Congress MLAs to move the amendment plea.

Facts of the Case 

The Rajasthan HC permitted 19 rebel Congress MLAs to move an application. The application challenges the constitutional validity of some provisions (Prithviraj Meena v. The Hon’ble Speaker).

The request for the same was made by the 19 MLAs, led by Prithviraj Meena. The plea challenged the Legislative Assembly Speaker’s July 14 defection notice.

Arguments

Senior Counsels Harish Salve and Mukul Rohatgi appeared for the petitioners. Senior Counsel Singhvi and the Advocate General, NK Maloo appeared for the respondents.

The plea was moved following a show-cause notice issued by the Speaker of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly on July 14. It was issued to the 19 MLAs asking them to explain their anti-party activities.

Pilot and the other 18 Congress MLAs have challenged the notice as being a move of unholy haste which is mala fide and contrary to Assembly rules.

As per the plea, the Speaker, upon receiving the notice, issued notice to all the 19 MLAs on the same day. Speaker asked them to file a reply within two days. The Speaker called for an ex-parte decision from his end if a decision not made by 1pm.

The plea states that this unholy haste on the part of the Speaker is contrary to the assembly rules. A minimum of seven days’ time has to give for a reply.

Court’s Observations

The High Court has been urged to set aside the Speaker’s July 14 show-cause notice. In addition to that, it declares that the MLA’s actions do not constitute defection. Furthermore, it also requests the HC to uphold their status as members of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly.

Thus, if the rebels avoid disqualification and get clearance to vote as Congress members, the Ashok Gehlot-led government could fall. Therefore, he needs 101 MLAs to vote for him in the 200- member Assembly. Gehlot claims the support of 106 MLAs, which Team Pilot is against.

Hence, if the rebel MLAs are disqualified, the majority mark will drop, making it easier for Ashok Gehlot to win a floor test.

Decision

Therefore, after taking up the plea, Justice Sharma passed the order. Furthermore, he allowed the petitioners to move the amendment application. This was done despite the Advocate’s (Singhvi) vehement objections. Thus, the order passed, states:

“Without expressing any opinion on the contentions put forth by both the sides, let the petition be listed on the filing of the application for amendment of the writ petition.

The court further directed that a copy of the intended application be provided to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -