Rajasthan High Court Issues Notice on the Plea Challenging the Extension of RERA to Real Estate Projects

Must Read

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner....

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

Follow us

The Jaipur Bench of the Rajasthan High Court on last Wednesday issued a notice on a PIL. The PIL is for challenging an order passed Rajasthan Real Estate Regulation Authority. The order grants an extension for the completion of registered real estate projects.

Facts of the Case 

The real estate sector in the country has suffered huge setbacks. Due to lockdown and after relaxation non-availability of labor has made the real estate sector come to a standstill.

There are lakhs of homebuyers who are waiting for possession of their dream homes. On request of the CREDAI, the Central Government has declared the COVID-19 as a force majeure situation. Thus, real estate projects which were due for completion got an automatic extension. The extension of a timeline of 6 months to cover the COVID-19 lockdown situation. But in an extreme case, Rajasthan RERA Authority has extended it for 1 year.

This step even included projects which were due for compliance before the announcement of lockdown. The extension is permitted due to the COVID-19 impact on the business. Thus, the automatic extension for completion ought to have been only for the projects of which completion date were on or after 19th Mach 2020.

Arguments

Chief Justice Indrajit Mahanty and Justice Satish Kumar Sharma issued the notice. The impugned order dated May 13, 2020, grants across the board extension to all such projects.

The petition is filed by Advocate Ashish Sharma through Advocates Nipun Singhvi and Pranjul Chopra. The petition states that clause 6 of the impugned order is liable to be quashed. The said order, passed for easing the industry suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic. Though it fails to differentiate those projects which have lapsed before 19.03.2020 without any force majeure event. The violation of said Act, 2016, and the buyer-seller agreement in such cases is not a result of force majeure events.

Court’s Observation

Section 12 mandates that if the person intends to withdraw from a project due to the following:

  • an incorrect statement made by the promoter in the notice advertisement
  • An incorrect prospectus
  • the model apartment plot or building

The Court opined that the promoter ought to return the entire investment along with interest and compensation. This is because no interest or compensation is payable for false statements made as per Section 12 of the RERA, 2016 The said order, passed with misapplication of law and fact, seeks to exempt a delinquent promoter for a wrongful act committed. However, irrespective of the fact of with or without the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it still remains a wrongful act. The order suffers from infirmities and thus deserves to be set-aside, the plea states.

Decision

Union Finance Minister had announced to treat the COVID-19 period as a force majeure situation. Ministry of Housing and Urban Development will issue advisories for the same. It also stated registration and completion date for all registered projects expiring on or after March 25, 2020, can be suo motu extended only by six months even without any individual applications.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -