Rajasthan High Court: Accused to be Subjected to Custody Only If Tested Negative for COVID-19

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

Rajasthan High Court has guided the State Government to conduct a COVID-19 test for anybody sent to judicial/police custody post the virus’ breakout. This is to ensure that only the individuals who are free from the malady of COVID-19 are behind bars.

Facts of the Case

One hundred thirty prisoners in Rajasthan tested positive for COVID-19. There is a high risk of the disease spreading in the state’s prison system.

The order stated that ‘only’ an accused who tests negative will face judicial or police custody. “Whenever discovered negative, at exactly that point permit such accused people to be remanded to jail custody/police custody”. The order said.

However, the order did not include the provisions for those accused that tested positive. Jail authorities in the State need to keep new jail entrants in detached wards. Their wards are to be separate from the general wards for jail prisoners, for 14 to 21 days.

Additionally, the Courts need to guide jail authorities to ensure that tests are undertaken for detainees before moving them from the detached wards to general ones. These steps are to prevent the coronavirus from spreading to detainees.

Consequently, authorities in direct contact with detainees testing positive require unique consideration guaranteeing that they remained protected from the disease. Furthermore, it asked authorities to guarantee the test for jail staff members and their relatives weekly despite the cost.

Medical officials of each region need to review segregation wards in jails. Thus, the proposal includes that jail authorities become responsible for the cleanliness and tidiness of the wards. Detainees testing positive should have access to doctors on an everyday basis.

Observations made by the Court

“The doctors will guarantee a visit to disconnected wards and examine the detainees there consistently and record the equivalent,” the order said.

The aforesaid changes are in the province of Rajasthan. “They need to incorporate bearings in their SOP for jails for the reason for the present COVID pandemic,” says the order.

The Additional Chief Secretary (Home) told the bench in his explanation that the State Government has made a Standard Operating Procedure to manage the confirmation of accused to jails.

In addition to that, he said according to the SOP; exceptional isolation wards have been made in jails where an accused or detainee is required to stay for 21 days. Therefore, post isolation if detainees test negative their transfer to the general wards takes place. The bench along these lines guided the State Government to further incorporate the new standards in the SOP.

Brief Instructions

  • It is necessary to test the accused of corona infection by nearby medical authorities.
  • The Court has ordered the formation of boards of trustees comprising of the secretary of region’s legitimate authority.
  • Additionally, the delegate/president/secretary of the nearby bar affiliation will visit each jail inside their regions and check the status of jails.
  • The boards of trustees will present a report before the part secretary of Rajasthan states legitimate administration authority (RSLSA) before May 22.
  • And the RSLSA will introduce it before the Court.

The Court scheduled the next hearing on May 27. In Rajasthan, there are almost 20,000 detainees in different jails having a lodging limit of 22,000.

Chief Justice Indrajit Mahanty and Justice Ashok Gaur headed the bench. Moreover, suo moto cognisance of the flare-up of cases led to the Court’s decision.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -