Rajasthan HC Quashes FIR against Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for criticising the “Brahminical Patriarchy”

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

In the recent turn of events, the Rajasthan HC Quashed the FIR against Jack and Anna M Vetticad.

Brief Facts of the Case 

In November 2018, Dorsey held a poster saying “Smash Brahminical patriarchy”. He got comments later. This incident took place on one of his visits to India in 2018 when he was meeting a few female journalists. The Brahmin community accused him of spreading hate and hurting their sentiments. Some public figures such as Mohandas Pai, former finance chief of Infosys also did the same. He compared it with Anti-Semitisms and hate-mongering.

Rajasthan HC Quashes FIR against Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for criticising the “Brahminical Patriarchy”

However, there were some that supported this step, Including many prominent feminist figures such as South Asian historian Audrey Truschke. Also, many others came out in the support of the twitter Mogul. That upper caste privileged men are condemning this act. She also called out the years of oppression Dalits and women. The same women who had to face Upper discrimination which still exists.

Rajkumar Sharma’s FIR mentions the targeting of Brahmins. According to him, such posters hurt the religious sentiments of the brahmin community.

Sections 295-A, 500, 501, 504, 505, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code is relevant in this FIR. Under the argument that this step hurt the sentiments of the Brahmin community and stoked communal disharmony.

Contentions of the Plaintiff 

The lawyers on the part of the plaintiff pointed out how this promotes caste disharmony. About how the brahmin community forms the main part of traditions, rituals, and rites. Thus, Jack’s actions were in total disregard of the existing status quo. Also, condemned as an attempt to malign the image of the Brahmin community in Indian society.

Contentions of the Respondents 

Mahesh Jethmalani and Nishant Bora, the defence, who spoke for Jack and Vetticad argued about a get-together. In which a woman came to give over the poster to Mr. Jack Dorsey, in the presence of the applicants.

Ms. Anna M Vetticad on her Twitter account posted the photo of Dorsey in support. Without having any aim to hurt the opinions or sentiments, of any segment of the general public.

They had contended that by the simple publication of these words, it doesn’t mean that the religious thoughts of anyone in the nation are being harmed. The idea of Brahmanical Patriarchy is to uphold compelling sexual power over women. To keep up a patrilineal progression. The established one of a kind to Hindu society with male domination.

They said that the current situation isn’t enough to call it as targeting religious sentiments. It is a sociological conversation. Only by presenting these words expected on challenging the said idea. The applicants are not answerable for the offences credited to them in the said FIR.

Court’s Order 

The bench of Justice Sandeep Mehta pointed out that the expression which has been reprimanded in the FIR is not to inspire any other thoughts. He pointed out that it might be translated as laying a test to the sociological ideas of a specific area/sexual orientation of the Brahmin people group. Yet, by no means inspire any other thoughts. The words therefore do not harm religious beliefs.

The words in the poster, most of all pass on the sentiments of the concerned individual. Not of the Brahminical framework existing in society. Opinions cannot be forced onto everyone as J. Mehta stated while cancelling the FIR.

Conclusion 

On an end note, this FIR shows forces supporting the Brahmin community. Not only over other castes but other women as well. These systems prevail in India and the Indian Society. They are now ready to challenge even the small image of dominance. Yet, the Judiciary is acting as a guiding hand in these matters. The quashing of this FIR shows that Courts are with women when it comes to patriarchy in any form or matter. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -