Rajasthan HC Allows Private Schools To Collect a Portion of Their Fees

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

In a recent development related to the lockdown relaxation process, Rajasthan HC has allowed Private schools to collect 70% of their fees in instalments. Earlier, the schools were prohibited from expelling students in case of failure on the part of their parents to pay their fees.

Facts

The Court was hearing multiple pleas moved on behalf of private schools in Rajasthan. This was in the light of a pro-student directive. The pleas were challenging a Rajasthan Government directive that required private schools to defer school fee collection amid the pandemic.

An initial notice directed private schools to hold off on collecting fees for three months, while a subsequent circular/notice dated July 7 extended the operation of the first circular till further notice.

Arguments

The schools argued that they had infrastructural accommodations to maintain and that they had to pay their ancillary staff, while also shouldering the costs of online classes and teachers’ salaries.

They also stated that the earlier decision by the HC was causing a lot of strain on the functioning of private schools. The schools argued that a more sustainable step should be taken to allow smooth functioning on the side of schools itself.

Though the option to stop students from attending classes on account of such failure was permitted, the earlier order stated that schools were prohibited from removing students from schools on their parents’ inability to pay their fees. 

Court’s Observation

The Bench sought to balance the two opposing interests. It observed that the proper functioning of private schools should be in sync with relief for the students and their parents. The Bench sought to strike a balance between the two opposing interests.

The Court decided that a balance is required to be struck between the financial difficulty of the school management relating to the the the the the release of the salary of the staff and least upkeep of school on one side and the financial pressure, which has come on the parents due to the COVID 19 pandemic and the subsequent lock-down.

Court’s Decision

Thus, in the interim order passed on Monday, the Rajasthan High Court has allowed private schools in the State to collect a part of their yearly tuition fees.

It laid down certain guidelines-

  • Students cannot be removed from schools for their parents’ failure to pay the tuition fee instalments in time.
  • However, students can be forbidden from attending online classes for such failure to pay up the fee.
  • The said 70% of the tuition fees should be paid for the period from March 2020 in three instalments. The 1st instalment is to be paid before or on September 30, the second instalment is to be paid before or on November 30, 2020, and the third instalment is to be paid by January 31, 2021.

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -