Kerala HC Stays Government Order For Deferment Of Salaries Of State Government Employees: Says Salary Comes Within The Scope Of Article 300A

Must Read

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Follow us

The Kerala Government on the 24th of April issued an order facilitating the reduction of six days of the salary of government employees who earn above Rs.20,000 for the next five months owing to the financial crisis it was suffering due to the domino effect caused by disasters it had experienced in the past year.

The order, however, did not apply to those employees who had contributed one month’s salary to the CM’s Disaster Relief Fund. The writ petition challenging the order was heard by Justice Bechu Kurian of the Kerala High Court.

Grounds For Challenge

The counsels for the petitioners, in summary, put forth two significant challenges to the order passed by the State’s government.

Firstly, the government order was violative of Article 300A of the Constitution of India. Article 300A of the Constitution does not allow the property of any person to be taken away without authority. The petitioners contended that the impugned order had no legal authority to support its issuance. Further, the apex Court has held that money also comes within the scope of ‘property’ in State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ranojirao Shinde.

Secondly, the petitioners contended that the right to receive salary came under Article 21 of the Constitution. They argued that the State Government were rubbing salt in the wounds of those government employees leading the fight against the spread of the virus in Kerala and have been working tirelessly for the last month to do so.

The petitioners also drew the attention of the court to the Kerala Services Rules, which gave the government employees a statutory right to their salaries.

The Epidemic Diseases Act And The Disaster Management Act: A Shield?

Sections 38 and 39 of the Disaster Management Act allow the State Government to ensure the cooperation of all its departments during times of disaster and impose certain duties on the departments.

The Advocate General, CP Sudhakara Prasad referred to Sections 38 and 39 of the Disaster Management Act as the legal authority which allowed the State Government to issue such an order. He also argued that Section 2 of the Epidemic Diseases Act allowed the government to pass such orders when it found that the current law was insufficient during the breakout of an epidemic virus.

The Court’s Ruling

After considering the arguments of both parties, Justice Kurian found that the executive order indeed had no legal authority for its backing as there was no express provision in any of the enactments referred to be the Advocate General which allowed the state government to issue orders pertaining to the salary of its employees.

Justice Kurian observed that the right to property could not be taken away by a mere executive order. He drew a parallel between pensions and salaries, stating that pensions were “deferred salaries” and they could not be withheld without the authority of law. Therefore the same would apply to salaries because salary could prima facie be regarded as property under Article 300A of the Constitution. He stated that salaries were also a part of the “conditions of service” enshrined in Article 309 of the Constitution.

Justice Kurian also found the term “financial difficulty” to be insufficient grounds for the government to issue orders for deferment of salary. Justice Kurian in his order stated,

However laudable and appreciable, the action of the State may be in its fight against the pandemic, when this Court is called upon to determine an issue which has far-reaching legal consequences and which affects the vested right of its citizens, this Court cannot ignore the legal framework in which our society revolves.

Accordingly, he stayed the operation of the government order for two months and scheduled the next hearing of the writ petition for the 20th of May, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -