Kerala High Court Directs Central Government To File Details Of Aid Given To Indians In Gulf Countries

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court comprising of Justice Devan Ramachandran and Justice T R Ravi continued hearing a batch of writ petitions seeking the return of Indians stranded in the United Arab Emirates to India. The petition sought the return of specific categories of persons, namely, people in labour camps, those needing emergency treatment and pregnant women.

Countries all over the world are going through tough times due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hundreds of thousands of people are stranded in foreign countries far away from home. Among them are about thirty-four lakh Indians in the UAE.

A State-Specific Policy

On the previous date of hearing, Advocate Harees Beeran asserted that the Centre should be following a policy that is “state-specific”. He pointed out that the state’s administration was willing to accommodate two lakh Indians and re-iterated the fact that Kerala was combating the COVID-19 crisis quite effectively in comparison to other states. He argued that public health was a state subject and there should be no objection from the Centre when the state government was confident of accommodating those who return.

Advocate Suvin Menon, appearing for the Centre, stated that the benefits accrued to the country due to the lockdown would be decimated if lakhs of Indians were allowed to return to the country.

Indians in foreign countries

Advocate Thulsi Raj K, appearing in a connected writ petition stated that the Centre should ease the restrictions on travel because the UAE had requested countries to arrange for their citizens to be taken back. He contended that India was the only country not allowing its citizens to be reunited with their families during times of distress, even though Emirates airlines were willing to resume operations to facilitate their return.

Justice Devan countered this by stating that such restrictions came in only after the implementation of the lockdown and the Centre had taken measures to evacuate Indians from various countries prior to its declaration.  He went on to state that the situation is different when the entire country is locked down.

A practical solution

The Bench enquired about the State Government’s capability to accommodate those who would return from the UAE and directed the Additional Advocate General to file a statement regarding the state’s current facilities to accommodate them.  The Central Government was required to file a detailed report on the support it had given the Indians stranded in the Gulf country.

Scheduling the next hearing for 24th April, Justice Devan added that the Court was keen on reaching a solution that was practical in the current circumstances.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -