Delhi High Court Reverses Order on Police Plea Challenging Bail To Sanjeev Chawla For Match Fixing

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

In the case of Sanjeev Kumar Chawla  V. The State, the Delhi High Court on 02-05-2020, saved its Order on an invocation by Delhi Police defying the bail granted to Sanjeev Chawla, an alleged bookie and a key blamed in one of the Cricket’s biggest Match- Fixing Scandals that involved former South African Hansie Cronje and his fellow Cricketers Herschelle Gibbs and Nicky Boje.

Sanjeev Kumar Chawla was accused under Section 173 of the C.R.P.C,1973 filled by Inspector, Crime Branch dated 22-07-2013 and for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Section 420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 with an alleged conspiracy to fix matches during the February-March,2000 in alleged connivance with Mr Hansie Cronje, Caption of the South Africa Cricket Team.

Chawla was extradited from the UK four years after the procedure to bring him back to India for further probe in the case began. The Delhi Police Crime Branch had filed a Charge- Sheet.in the Case almost 13 years after the Scandal broke out, the first ever to be delayed for that long. A Charge-Sheet is usually filed within Three months of the registration of a case. The Charge- Sheet said Chawla had played the “most vital role” in the crime. It said Chawla not only acted as a conduit between the bookies but also fixed matches in connivance with Cronje.

According to the Charge-Sheet, the first Test match in Mumbai and the first One- Day International in Cochin in 2000 were fixed. This, the Police said, resulted in wrongful gain to the accused and wrongful loss in general to the public at large, who had gone to watch the match “believing that they would witness truly competitive matches in which each player would perform optimally”.

Justice Asha Menon, who directed the consultation through video conferencing, heard the contentions of the counsel for Delhi Police and Chawla and reserved the order on the plea.

An Alleged Bookie Pleaded for a Bail

Senior Advocate Vikas Pahwa, speaking for Chawla, said while saving the request, the High Court has asked the Magistrate worried to acknowledge the Bail Bond and guarantees outfitted by the blamed and direct his discharge subject to the result of the High Court procedures.

The representing Counsel Said that High Court has asked Chawla to give an undertaking that he will abide by the outcome of its order and he along with the sureties is bound by the undertaking.

Chawla, who was extradited from London in February, was allowed Bail by a Trial Court here on April 30 on furnishing of a personal bond of Rs 2 Lakh and two securities of the like amount.

Counsel representing Chawla pleaded Bail saying in view of the COVID-19 Pandemic, there is a risk of getting infected with the virus in jail where it is difficult to keep up social distancing.

Delhi Police Defying The Bail

Delhi Police defying the Bail Order, the Police sought its cancellation on the ground that Chawla is a British National and it took 20 years to bring him back to India and there is the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice.

The Police, in the plea recorded through Prosecutor Kewal Singh Ahuja, said the rules as for COVID-19 and arrival of under-trial detainees are not relevant to Chawla considering his supposed job in the Match-Fixing as he has played as the fundamental channel in the Match-Fixing.

Chawla’s Counsel contradicted the Police’s invocation saying Chawla never applied for Bail in 60 days which indicated he was helping out the Prosecuting Agency and the Trial is pending for Seven years and charges have not been encircled and it will need some investment to finish the Trial.

He said the request to drop the Bail was not practical and keeping in mind that the Supreme Court and High Court are de-blocking correctional facilities to contain the spread of Corona Virus, Police is keeping the accused in prison.

The High Court has asked both the sides to give their written submission by May 4, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -