Trademarks and their Remedies

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

[mks_dropcap style=”square” size=”52″ bg_color=”#ffffff” txt_color=”#dd3333″]A[/mks_dropcap] trademark is a mark, logo or trade name which identifies a business to its customers. It is generally words, phrases, logos and symbols used by producers to identify their goods.  However, shapes, sounds, fragrances and colors may also be registered as trademarks. The history of trademark dates back to one thousand B.C. During that time, the craftsmen engraved their names on the piece of art made by them just to prove their authenticity over the work done. But today it is used to distinguish between the products made by two unlike companies. The different logos, design, symbols are made in order to attract the consumers. Trademark helps the owner to prevent the use of similar of identical signs by competitors if such trademark can lead confusion. A trademark is different from patent and copyright. Patent protects an invention whereas copyright protects an artistic and literary works.

Types of trademark available are:

  • Names, including any surname
  • an invented word or any arbitrary dictionary word
  • letters or any numeral or any combination
  • symbols
  • monograms
  • shape of goods or their packing

In India, the classification system prevails where goods and services has been classified into classes of registration. This classification made by WIPO namely the International Classification of Goods and Services which consists of 34 classes of goods and 8 classes of services.  And this classification is followed by many countries of the world. The trademark provides an exclusive right to the proprietor and any infringement will cost to the person who has infringed the right in respect of any goods and services. Though registration of trademark is not compulsory in India but if it is done it protects the person and also provides legal remedies. Registration is a legal process provided under for under Trade Mark Act, 1999.

A trademark infringement hampers the reputation of the owner as well as his business with devastating consequences. For this purpose remedies are provide in order to mitigate the expenses bear by the owner. It is a valuable part of a daily business and informs the world about the product and its services. In order to minimize the damages suffered by owner, it is necessary to prove that genuinely his right has been infringed.

  1. It is very necessary to be proved by the owner that the goods and services provided by him must be associated with goodwill which is spoiled by some other person who has misused and infringed the right of owner. Goodwill is thus the benefit and advantage of a name and get-up, and it is the attractive force which brings in business. Goodwill is not visible but is made in the mind of customers which allows them to make benefit out of that services. Therefore, establishing a goodwill on the part of plaintiff in his business or his goods or services is necessary to which the trade or public will be led to associate the defendant’s activities. In one of the decided case Durga Dutt Sharma vs. Navaratna Pharmacy Laboratories where it was held that the onus to prove infringement is on plaintiff.
  2. False representation by the defendant to attract more customers is a punishable offence. In Spalding vs. Gamage, it was explained by the Lord that: “Where the plaintiff and defendant were not competing traders in the line of business, a false suggestion by the defendant that their business were connected with each other would damage the reputation and thus the goodwill of plaintiff’s business.”
  3.  Damages plays an important role in determining how much loss is suffered by the owner. It is result of erroneous step taken by the defendant which was against the rights of the plaintiff. It degrades the value of the goods produced by the original company.


Remedies are available to those whose right has been infringed. Generally, damages are the most common remedy but apart from that there are various other remedies are available to mitigate the losses incurred by the owner.

  • Injunctions are provided by the court to stop the use of trademark by the infringer. It is a kind of civil remedy and its main purpose is to prohibit the person whose act is unjust and ruing the reputation of the other by unauthorized use of the trademark. There are mainly two types of injunction, permanent and temporary injunction. Former is for permanent restraining whereas latter is for some specific time.
  • Another remedy is the unfair competition law which provides for the trademark dilution. The main element of the infringement is the confusion which arises between the two products. However, in some cases where the problem is nowhere related to confusion but is about unfair use of the trademark which causes damage to the owner. Thus, the law of unfair trade competition is a wide ranging concept and basically helps to prohibit the practice which society seems to be unfit. But with the changing world, changes are being made. In one of the recent judgment of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. vs. Champion computers where parallel import has become a boon and has also created a problematic Court and made certain changes in the trademark law. This bench has overruled the judgment given by single bench stating that parallel imports are not authorized under the India trademark law. But the division bench clearly upheld that parallel import do not infringe the right of proprietor and parallel importation is valid under the Trademark Act, 1999.
  • Monetary compensation is also granted to compensate the trademark owner. It can also be increased up to 3 times if it is as per the laws laid down. Even the court has the discretion to award to the owner and other expenses incurred by the owner for bringing up the action. In Time Incorporated vs. Lokesh sriastav4 in this court awarded both compensatory damages and punitive damages for infringement of the trademark Time.


Therefore, the protection of trademark is important not only for the benefit of business but also for the protection of consumer from fraud and any conduct which violates the right. The Trademarks Act, 1999, the law provides for a better protection of trademarks, the fact that the trademark law provides protection to trademarks has come out to be a reality. The present Act expressly recognizes the common law remedy and thus saves both the registered and unregistered trademarks from being misused.

Latest News

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -