Delhi High Court allows Termination of Pregnancy in Minor Rape Case

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On the 10th of August, 2020 the High Court of Delhi held a virtual hearing in the matter of Minor P (Through Mother M) vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. The Court allowed the termination of pregnancy citing psychological complications, as the victim of rape was a minor. The Court passed the order after considering the report of the medical board constituted by it and after evaluating the risk to the life of the survivor.

Facts of the Case

The Petitioner (name withheld) is a minor, aged sixteen years old, is a resident of Delhi. The Petitioner submitted that she had not been keeping well for the past one and a half years and used to faint quite often. While she was cleaning the area behind her jhuggi (slum dwelling), she stated that she had one such episode of fainting. When she regained her consciousness, the Accused (Pankaj Bhaiya) was said to be standing there by the Petitioner. She suspected that the rape occurred while she was unconsciousness.

Since that incident, she had started feeling nauseous and dizzy but did not suspect that she was pregnant. As her periods eventually stopped, she informed the nurses of Acharya Bhikshu Hospital about it. She then proceeded to get her urine samples tested, which did not confirm her pregnancy.

Considering the situation at hand, she was taken to the Mahavir Hospital, Pitampura for further medical examination. The subsequent report revealed that she was pregnant. Given the circumstances of the case, the same was reported to the Police. An FIR was filed under Section 376 of IPC (rape) and Section 6 of POSCO Act (Aggravated penetrative sexual assault) at the Police Station in Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi.

Submissions before the Court

The petitioner had been suffering a considerable amount of distress due to her pregnancy. The Petitioner and her family sought termination of the pregnancy. The doctors stated that the Petitioner was in the advanced stages of pregnancy, and the same could not be terminated. It was in the context mentioned above that the petitioner had filed the present petition.

The Court passed an order dated 7th August 2020, directing the Superintendent of Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital to constitute a Medical Board to examine the petitioner. The Board was to report whether the termination of the pregnancy was likely to involve any sort of potential risk to the Petitioner. It was also directed that the Medical Board evaluate the risk of continuation of pregnancy.

Dr Renuka Malik and Dr Indu Chawla analysed the Petitioner’s report and stated that she was indeed under considerable stress. The Medical report (received electronically) revealed that she had been pregnant for about 22 weeks and 6 days with a marginal error of plus/minus 2 weeks. The clinical psychologist had also stated that continuation of the pregnancy might have psychological complications. The risk involving the termination of pregnancy was also explained to the Petitioner and her father.

Dr Indu Chawla also stated that further tests such as blood tests are required to assess whether there is any additional risk. She stated that subject to evaluating such risks, the Petitioner’s pregnancy could be terminated.

Observations of the Court

The High Court of Delhi had allowed the present petition. The Bench of Hon’ble Justice Vibhu Bakhru ordered the same, after considering the report of the Medical Board. The Court directed the petitioner be admitted to Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, and necessary procedures are carried out for termination of the pregnancy. Additionally, the procedure would be carried out only if the physical parameters of the petitioner did not indicate any added risk.

The Court also recorded its appreciation of the concerned doctors of the Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital for promptly constituting the Medical Board in examining the petitioner. Thus, the Court disposed of the petition.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -