Allahabad HC Releases Pediatrician Khan Known for Giving Provocative Speech Against CAA During Protests

Must Read

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Follow us

On the 1st of September, 2020, the High Court of Allahabad released Dr Kafeel Khan and set aside his detention under the National Security Act (NSA) for giving a provocative speech during anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests way back in December, 2019.

Background of the Case

Mr Khan was arrested on 19th January 2020 for giving a speech at the Aligarh Muslim University (that was deemed provocative by the BJP-led Uttar Pradesh Government) on 13th December 2019 amidst the raging anti – Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests. This Habeas corpus plea was moved by Mr Khan’s mother, Nuzhat Parween, who had approached the Supreme Court of India in March this year, seeking her son’s release. However, the Bench disposed of the plea with an observation that Allahabad HC is the appropriate forum for dealing with the issue. Following the same, she had filed the petition under the High Court of Allahabad. Nevertheless, on 11th August 2020, the Supreme Court had asked the Allahabad High Court to decide within fifteen days the plea for the release of Dr Kafeel Khan. However, on the 15th of August, 2020 Mr. Khan’s detention was further extended the term of detention for three months

from the date the term of six months expires.  The present Habeas Corpus writ petition was filed questioning the validity of the detention order dated 13th February 2020, and the follow-up order dated 4th August 2020.

Submissions at the court

Learned counsel for the petitioner had argued that,

  • No material was provided in the satisfaction that the detention of Dr Kafeel Khan is necessary to prevent any activity under sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. The satisfaction recorded by the appropriate government to detain Dr Kafeel Khan is ill-founded and is based on malicious analysis of the facts
  • The order of detention was passed only to frustrate the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh on 10th February 2020 directing the State Government to release Dr.Kafeel Khan from custody on bail after furnishing the sureties and bail bonds.
  • The detention brought into effect under order dated 13th February 2020 deserves to be declared illegal as the authority making the order of detention did not communicate the grounds for detention sufficient to afford the opportunity of making representation against the order.
  • The detention of Dr Kafeel Khan deserves to be revoked as the State of Uttar Pradesh as well as the Central Government failed to decide expeditiously the representation submitted by the detenue.

However, the Learned Additional Advocate General had stated that the materials available are not open to being examined & interfered by the Court under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and had said the contents of the speech indicate that the detenue was intending to harm communal harmony, peace, and tranquillity and for the purpose, he prompted students community to be aggressive.

Court’s Reading

Given the above submissions at the court, the bench of Justices Govind Mathur (Chief Justice) and Saumitra Dayal Singh had released Dr Kafeel Khan by stating the following reasons: 

  • Neither detention of Mr Khan under the National Security Act, 1980 nor extension of the detention is sustainable in the eye of law.
  • Also, the facts stated are not acceptable being not supported by any material or evidence and the same violates a precious fundamental right of a detenue enshrined under Article 22 of the Constitution.
  • The order of detention dated 13th February 2020 passed by District Magistrate, Aligarh, and confirmed by the State of Uttar Pradesh is set aside. 
  • The extension of the period of detention of  Dr. Kafeel Khan is also declared illegal.

After being in the prison for about 10 months, Mr Khan was released by the High Court of Judicature, Allahabad on the 1st of September, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments of the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -