Allahabad HC Releases Pediatrician Khan Known for Giving Provocative Speech Against CAA During Protests

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

On the 1st of September, 2020, the High Court of Allahabad released Dr Kafeel Khan and set aside his detention under the National Security Act (NSA) for giving a provocative speech during anti-Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests way back in December, 2019.

Background of the Case

Mr Khan was arrested on 19th January 2020 for giving a speech at the Aligarh Muslim University (that was deemed provocative by the BJP-led Uttar Pradesh Government) on 13th December 2019 amidst the raging anti – Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests. This Habeas corpus plea was moved by Mr Khan’s mother, Nuzhat Parween, who had approached the Supreme Court of India in March this year, seeking her son’s release. However, the Bench disposed of the plea with an observation that Allahabad HC is the appropriate forum for dealing with the issue. Following the same, she had filed the petition under the High Court of Allahabad. Nevertheless, on 11th August 2020, the Supreme Court had asked the Allahabad High Court to decide within fifteen days the plea for the release of Dr Kafeel Khan. However, on the 15th of August, 2020 Mr. Khan’s detention was further extended the term of detention for three months

from the date the term of six months expires.  The present Habeas Corpus writ petition was filed questioning the validity of the detention order dated 13th February 2020, and the follow-up order dated 4th August 2020.

Submissions at the court

Learned counsel for the petitioner had argued that,

  • No material was provided in the satisfaction that the detention of Dr Kafeel Khan is necessary to prevent any activity under sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. The satisfaction recorded by the appropriate government to detain Dr Kafeel Khan is ill-founded and is based on malicious analysis of the facts
  • The order of detention was passed only to frustrate the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh on 10th February 2020 directing the State Government to release Dr.Kafeel Khan from custody on bail after furnishing the sureties and bail bonds.
  • The detention brought into effect under order dated 13th February 2020 deserves to be declared illegal as the authority making the order of detention did not communicate the grounds for detention sufficient to afford the opportunity of making representation against the order.
  • The detention of Dr Kafeel Khan deserves to be revoked as the State of Uttar Pradesh as well as the Central Government failed to decide expeditiously the representation submitted by the detenue.

However, the Learned Additional Advocate General had stated that the materials available are not open to being examined & interfered by the Court under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution and had said the contents of the speech indicate that the detenue was intending to harm communal harmony, peace, and tranquillity and for the purpose, he prompted students community to be aggressive.

Court’s Reading

Given the above submissions at the court, the bench of Justices Govind Mathur (Chief Justice) and Saumitra Dayal Singh had released Dr Kafeel Khan by stating the following reasons: 

  • Neither detention of Mr Khan under the National Security Act, 1980 nor extension of the detention is sustainable in the eye of law.
  • Also, the facts stated are not acceptable being not supported by any material or evidence and the same violates a precious fundamental right of a detenue enshrined under Article 22 of the Constitution.
  • The order of detention dated 13th February 2020 passed by District Magistrate, Aligarh, and confirmed by the State of Uttar Pradesh is set aside. 
  • The extension of the period of detention of  Dr. Kafeel Khan is also declared illegal.

After being in the prison for about 10 months, Mr Khan was released by the High Court of Judicature, Allahabad on the 1st of September, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments of the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -