Allahabad HC Quashes Familial Proceedings Considering it to be of Private Nature

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On the Order dated 2 September 2020, the High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had quashed the charges and further proceeding of the matter. The matter concerned matrimonial dispute and the Court regarded it as of private nature. Moreover, the Court found that the parties had already amicably settled the matter beforehand.

Background of the Case

The applicant no. 1 is Ayushi Gupta (wife) and applicant nos. 2 and 3 are her mother-in-law and sister-in-law. Although the matter concerns a matrimonial dispute, both the parties had amicably settled the matter. Further, the mother-in-law doesn’t want to carry on with the impugned case further. Initially, in a complaint case (Raghvendra Jaiswal vs.Smt. Ayushi Gupta & others), this dispute arose as the matter is of private nature and in the interests of justice; it would be necessary to quash the proceedings of this particular case.

The present application under Section 482 (Quashing of criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences) of CrPC has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings including the order dated 10 December 2019 in the aforementioned Complaint Case (which is pending Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar) that was filed under Sections 387 (Putting a person in fear of death or of grievous hurt, to commit extortion) and 506 (Punishment for Criminal Intimidation) IPC at the Police Station (PS) of Rail Bazar, Kanpur Nagar.

Submissions Before the Court

The learned Counsel for Ayushi Gupta and her family had put forth that the matrimonial dispute has already been settled amicably. Furthermore, the complainant also doesn’t want to proceed with any further charges. As this matter is private and both the parties had already compromised, quashing the proceedings is the best possible way ahead. It was also noted that none of the parties had any criminal history. The learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) had no objection if the parties had already compromised.

Court’s Reading and Decision

Given the above submissions, the bench comprised of Justice Raj Beer Singh, had directed that the dispute is private in nature and whether the parties have already compromised or not doesn’t make an impact on the society. So, the Court had quashed the proceedings and accordingly, the impugned proceedings in the case (Raghvendra Jaiswal vs. Smt. Ayushi Gupta & others) are also quashed. The Court, having taken into account the following observations had stated that: 

  • The power conferred under Section 482 of the Code to quash the criminal proceedings for the non-compoundable offences under Section 320 of the Code can be exercised in cases of a civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or arising out of the matrimonial relationship or family disputes and when the parties have resolved the entire dispute amongst themselves.
  • Such power should not be exercised in prosecutions which involve heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity, etc. Such offences are not private in nature and have a serious impact on society.
  • Similarly, such power is not to be exercised for the offences under the special statutes like Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity should not be quashed merely based on a compromise between the victim and the offender.
  • Offences under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act etc. would fall in the category of heinous and serious offences and, therefore, are to be treated as a crime against the society and not against the individual alone, and therefore, the criminal proceedings for the offence under Section 307 IPC and/or the Arms Act etc. which have a serious impact on the society cannot be quashed in exercise of powers under Section 482 of the Code, on the ground that the parties have resolved their entire dispute amongst themselves.

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -