Delhi HC Allows Pension to Non-Commissioned Defense Officers on Pro-Rata Basis

- Advertisement -

In the case of Brijlal Kumar and ors. v. UOI and ors., Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ruled that officers of defense forces who are non-commissioned are entitled to pro-rata pension, which was only given to commissioned officers.

Brief Facts

There were a total of 40 petitions filed, the petitioners, in each petition, impugned the letter/circular No. 8(3)/86/A/D(Pension/Services) dated 19th February 1987 issued by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and claimed pro-rata pension. The petitioners argued that exclusion from the benefit of pro-rata pension is of arbitrary nature and discriminatory, which violates fundamental rights given under articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.

Submissions Before the Court

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that AFT was not entertaining challenges, reliance was placed on an order of AFT, principal bench, which held that challenges to circular could not be entertained by AFT under section 14 of AFT Act as it did not give the power of issuance of writ to the AFT.

- Advertisement -

Learned counsel for the respondents objected to the maintainability thereof for the reason of availability of alternate remedy before AFT (Armed Forces Tribunal). Reliance was placed on L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261, to contend that AFT was empowered to test the vires of subordinate legislations and Rules.

Court’s Decision

The court made reference to All India Judges Association Vs. Union of India (1993) 4 SCC 288; State of Mizoram Vs. Mizoram Engineering Service Association (2004) 6 SCC 218 and State of Rajasthan Vs. Mahendra Nath Sharma (2015) 9 SCC 540 which held that the State cannot take a plea of financial burden to deny the legitimate dues and observed that rejection of representations made by petitioners, done by IAF before filing of these petitions for grant of pro-rata pension, were quashed and the court issued mandamus to respondent IAF.

The mandamus directed IAF to pay each petitioner pro-rata pensions within the duration of 12 weeks, from the date of discharge, till the date of payment. It was also directed that with effect from March 2021, IAF has to start payment of future pro-rata pension to each of the petitioners. If it is found that the arrears are not paid within 12 weeks, then said amount will be increased by 7% p.a. interest laid on it, from the expiry of twelve weeks, till the date of payment. Accordingly, the petitions were disposed of. 

- Advertisement -

Click here to view original judgment


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About the Author

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -spot_img