Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea for Change of Category From General to OBC-NCL

Must Read

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were...

Follow us

In the case of Sushma Ambati v. Ministry of Education and Another, Mr. Justice Jayant Nath, dismissed the petition stating that there was no merit to be found Petitioner’s plea for changing of category.

Brief facts

The petitioner desired directions, that the respondent declare the result of the daughter of the petitioner, considering her as an OBC-NCL category (“OBC Non-Creamy Layer”). It was submitted that respondent No.2 conducted the JEE (ADVANCE) exams. Daughter of the petitioner appeared in the JEE (MAINS) 2020 exam and opted for the category OBC-NCL. The result of the petitioner was declared and with a common rank list of 14731 whereas the same would have been 3098 for the OBC-NCL.

Arguments Before Court

A counter affidavit was filed by the Respondent No.2 which stated that the petitioner’s daughter has changed her category on her own and hence there was no merit in the writ petition. Also, that as per JEE (ADVANCE) 2020 information brochure (“Brochure”) category of a candidate can’t be changed after JEE (MAINS) 2020. It has to remain the same. Reference was made to Ujjwal Tripathi vs. Director General National Testing Agency case decided on 23.05.2019.

An additional affidavit was also filed by the petitioner, it stated that the exam of the daughter of the petitioner was on 27.09.2020. The petitioner was not in a position to select any other option but to select the third option which stated that the petitioner is not a valid OBC-NCL candidate. As, that now the petitioner’s daughter has received a valid caste certificate and hence should be allowed to participate as an OBC-NCL candidate.

Court’s observation

Court observed that petitioner’s pleas were misplaced and there was no reason for the category to be changed from OBC-NCL to the general category. It was also observed that the last date for filing of valid caste certificates was extended. But the petitioner didn’t take any step on the same.

Court’s Decision

Court observed that Ujjwal Tripathi vs. Director General National Testing Agency the judgment passed in this case was applicable to the facts of present case and found the petitioner has admitted while filling up the relevant form and agreed to be treated as a GEN category. Court dismissed the petition stating that there was no merit to be found in the same.

Click here to view full judgment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -