Here the Delhi High Court permits to make certain amendments in the Statement of Defense with a matter concerning Equitable Set-Off through looking at precedents.
Retention of dishonest government employee, who kept smuggled gold in his possession and for such seizure, and did not make any reports to his superiors will send wrong signals.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition in Interim Maintenance Matter After Finding No Proof for Interference
In the case of Amit Dhiman v Boski Dhiman, Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri found no ground to interfere in order passed by the family court regarding maintenance and dismissed the petition in absence of proof that showed respondent was...
In the case of Brijlal Kumar and ors. v. UOI and ors., Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ruled that officers of defense forces who are non-commissioned are entitled to pro-rata pension, which was only given to commissioned...
In the case of Jaskaran Singh Arora v State, NCT of Delhi and Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, the court decided not to take any action against respondent 2 and referred to a similar case of Danish Ali v....
In the case of United Constructions v UOI through dte. gen md accn project and anr. Justice Manmohan and Justice Sanjeev Narula held that no grounds were proven showing encashment of bank guarantees. Consequently, the present appeal was dismissed. Brief...
In the case of Ramesh Boghabhai Bhut v State and Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, quashed an FIR, accordingly allowing and disposing of the petition. Brief Facts The Petitioner, through a sole proprietorship, has been undertaking the business exporting fresh/dehydrated onions...
In the case of Sushma Ambati v. Ministry of Education and Another, Mr. Justice Jayant Nath, dismissed the petition stating that there was no merit to be found Petitioner’s plea for changing of category. Brief facts The petitioner desired directions, that...
Delhi HC Quashed Impugned Order and Directed to Award the Equivalence Certificate if Everything Found Is in Order
In the case of Anubandha Anand v Union of India, Mr. Justice Jayant Nath, quashed the impugned communication dated 14.10.2019 issued by Respondent No. 2 and was directed to process application of petitioner expeditiously. Brief facts The petitioner passed out his...
In the case of Umesh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Uttarakhand and another, Mr. Justice Maithani directed CBI to file FIR on the basis of para 8 of the petition in WP CRL no. 1187 of 2020, a case...
12Page 1 of 2