Deeksha Singh

Here the Delhi High Court permits to make certain amendments in the Statement of Defense with a matter concerning Equitable Set-Off through looking at precedents.

Retention of dishonest government employee, who kept smuggled gold in his possession and for such seizure, and did not make any reports to his superiors will send wrong signals.

In the case of Amit Dhiman v Boski Dhiman, Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri found no ground to interfere in order passed by the family court regarding maintenance and dismissed the petition in absence of proof that showed respondent was earning which made her ineligible for receiving any maintenance. Court also

In the case of Brijlal Kumar and ors. v. UOI and ors., Justice Asha Menon and Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ruled that officers of defense forces who are non-commissioned are entitled to pro-rata pension, which was only given to commissioned officers. Brief Facts There were a total of 40 petitions filed,

In the case of Jaskaran Singh Arora v State, NCT of Delhi and Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, the court decided not to take any action against respondent 2 and referred to a similar case of Danish Ali v. State and Anr. in Crl. M.C. 1727/2019, for false complaint under

In the case of United Constructions v UOI through dte. gen md accn project and anr. Justice Manmohan and Justice Sanjeev Narula held that no grounds were proven showing encashment of bank guarantees. Consequently, the present appeal was dismissed. Brief Facts An appeal was filed to challenge impugned order passed

In the case of Ramesh Boghabhai Bhut v State and Anr., Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, quashed an FIR, accordingly allowing and disposing of the petition. Brief Facts The Petitioner, through a sole proprietorship, has been undertaking the business exporting fresh/dehydrated onions and garlic and other perishable items to various countries

In the case of Sushma Ambati v. Ministry of Education and Another, Mr. Justice Jayant Nath, dismissed the petition stating that there was no merit to be found Petitioner’s plea for changing of category. Brief facts The petitioner desired directions, that the respondent declare the result of the daughter of

In the case of Anubandha Anand v Union of India, Mr. Justice Jayant Nath, quashed the impugned communication dated 14.10.2019 issued by Respondent No. 2 and was directed to process application of petitioner expeditiously. Brief facts The petitioner passed out his class 12th and thereafter, joined ICAS, a unit of