Chhattisgarh Government To Take Decision On Covid-19 Testing: Chhattisgarh High Court

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

Earlier on April 14, the Chhattisgarh High Court issued directions to the state government to set up the COVID-19 testing facilities and also to search for the people attended the Nizamuddin Markaz.

April 14th High Court Observation

As per the Chhattisgarh State Legal Service Authority (SLSA), the division of bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Goutam Bhaduri observed that there are a large number of positive cases at Katghora and the non-availability of the testing facilities at the Bilaspur. Though the non-availability of the testing facilities at Bilaspur is riskier because this city is way closer to Katghora.

The bench directed the state government to take steps for opening the testing facility of COVID-19 at Bilaspur within three days and followed by the Central Government to take steps to accord necessary sanction within the next three days.

The court listed the case for further hearing on 17th April 2020. But the Court again fixed it for April 20, 2020, as next hearing, due to technical reasons.

Previous Facts And Submissions

  • The High Court on 14th April stated that they had left the issue at the wisdom of the state government and concerned agencies so that the people of Bilaspur at other nearby areas can be helped in pandemic situations.
  • High Court while stating said that the Virology Laboratory at Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) in Bilaspur is not possible to open soon as its negative certain equipment from abroad.
  • A Private hospital R.B. Hospital of Bilaspur has the necessary equipment but lacks NABL accreditation to start the lab for testing of the COVID-19 virus.
  • Counsel For SLSA, Ashish Srivastava was submitted that if the state wanted to open the lab at Bilaspur R.B. Hospital, they can accord the permission at State Government Level.
  • Advocate General, Satish Chandra Verma said that the state government cannot acquire a private lab without following the procedure. By drawing the attention towards the affidavit of the Director Medical education argued that the state government has already written to ICMR for according sanction to R.B. Hospital, for starting the COVID-19 test facility.
  • Amicus Curiae, Prafull Bharat submitted that if the laboratory at RB Hospital has the equipment, then all the efforts should be made to make it operational.

April 20th Observations

On Monday i.e. April 20, it was observed that the roadmap for a lab in CIMS was designed by AIIMS and the training of manpower in respect of the CIMS Bilaspur was started by April 22, 2020.

After analysis, it was resolved that the COVID-19 test in Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Sciences (CIMS) was started after procurement of essential equipment needed for the testing.

It was observed that there was no gap in communication between AIIMS and State Government and the identification and treatment of COVID-19 patients was only possible because of their joint efforts.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -