Chhattisgarh Government To Take Decision On Covid-19 Testing: Chhattisgarh High Court

Must Read

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Follow us

Earlier on April 14, the Chhattisgarh High Court issued directions to the state government to set up the COVID-19 testing facilities and also to search for the people attended the Nizamuddin Markaz.

April 14th High Court Observation

As per the Chhattisgarh State Legal Service Authority (SLSA), the division of bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Goutam Bhaduri observed that there are a large number of positive cases at Katghora and the non-availability of the testing facilities at the Bilaspur. Though the non-availability of the testing facilities at Bilaspur is riskier because this city is way closer to Katghora.

The bench directed the state government to take steps for opening the testing facility of COVID-19 at Bilaspur within three days and followed by the Central Government to take steps to accord necessary sanction within the next three days.

The court listed the case for further hearing on 17th April 2020. But the Court again fixed it for April 20, 2020, as next hearing, due to technical reasons.

Previous Facts And Submissions

  • The High Court on 14th April stated that they had left the issue at the wisdom of the state government and concerned agencies so that the people of Bilaspur at other nearby areas can be helped in pandemic situations.
  • High Court while stating said that the Virology Laboratory at Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) in Bilaspur is not possible to open soon as its negative certain equipment from abroad.
  • A Private hospital R.B. Hospital of Bilaspur has the necessary equipment but lacks NABL accreditation to start the lab for testing of the COVID-19 virus.
  • Counsel For SLSA, Ashish Srivastava was submitted that if the state wanted to open the lab at Bilaspur R.B. Hospital, they can accord the permission at State Government Level.
  • Advocate General, Satish Chandra Verma said that the state government cannot acquire a private lab without following the procedure. By drawing the attention towards the affidavit of the Director Medical education argued that the state government has already written to ICMR for according sanction to R.B. Hospital, for starting the COVID-19 test facility.
  • Amicus Curiae, Prafull Bharat submitted that if the laboratory at RB Hospital has the equipment, then all the efforts should be made to make it operational.

April 20th Observations

On Monday i.e. April 20, it was observed that the roadmap for a lab in CIMS was designed by AIIMS and the training of manpower in respect of the CIMS Bilaspur was started by April 22, 2020.

After analysis, it was resolved that the COVID-19 test in Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Sciences (CIMS) was started after procurement of essential equipment needed for the testing.

It was observed that there was no gap in communication between AIIMS and State Government and the identification and treatment of COVID-19 patients was only possible because of their joint efforts.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -