Bombay High Court Rejects GN Saibaba’s Plea of Temporary Bail on Medical Grounds

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On 28th July 2020, Justice A.R Chandurkar and Justice Amit B. Borkar heard the case of Gokalkonda Naga Saibaba v. The State of Maharashtra. The Court rejected the bail plea of G.N. Saibaba. 

Facts of the Case 

The applicant committed offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, for which he was convicted for life. Due to certain health problems, he filed a bail application in the Court to get temporary bail for 45 days.

Applicant’s Arguments 

The learned counsel for the applicant stated that the applicant deserved bail on two grounds: 

  1. The COVID-19 infection is spreading in jail due to which many prison inmates and prison authorities had gotten infected, hence there are chances that the applicant may get infected by the same. 
  2. The health condition of the applicant had been deteriorating day by day. 

Additionally, since his mother is also not doing very well at this time, he needed to be with her. The two jail attendees who were looking after him had also not returned because of the lockdown. There was a lack of food and medical supplies, as well.

Respondent’s Arguments

The learned counsel for the respondent referred to the report on the health status of the applicant prepared by the Chief Medical Officer of the Nagpur Central Prison. According to the report, the applicant had tested negative for the coronavirus infection. Furthermore, the fact that he was in a high-security prison cell meant that there could be no contact between the applicant and other inmates in the jail. Moreover, the necessary medicine and food supply of the applicant was being taken care of effectively. 

Generally, the prison staff also undergo blood tests to check the infection of COVID-19, and only those who test negative are allowed inside the prison. Additionally, the bail application previously filed by the applicant was rejected by the Court on 25th July 2020, and in that bail application, the applicant had not stated the present facts. Therefore this present application should be rejected.

Court’s Observation 

The Court relied on the medical report of the Chief Medical Officer Nagpur and observed that the applicant tested negative for COVID-19, and no evidence was submitted by the applicant that could prove his health deterioration. Moreover, the applicant was kept separately from other inmates, which ruled out the argument that he could be infected by the virus. 

Court’s Decision 

The Court rejected the bail application based on the medical reports given by the Chief Medical Officer, Nagpur, and on the statements presented by the jail authorities that the health of the applicant is being taken care of.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -