Bombay HC Remands Case as DC Fails to Consider the Decision of Appellate Authority

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

A division bench of Justice S.C. Gupte & Justice Abhay Ahuja of the Bombay High Court passed a judgment in the case of M.D. Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and others under Article 226 of the Constitution. It was alleged that the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax violated the principle of natural justice while passing an order under Maharashtra Value Added Tax, 2002.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner is a Private Limited company which deals with the trading of precious and non-ferrous metals like gold, silver, nickel, cobalt etc. The issue arose on the trading assessment of nickel and cobalt. The petitioner entered into an agreement for the provision of warehouse and storage facilities with Arshiya Free Trade Warehousing Zone (AFTWZ), which is deemed to be a Special Economic Zone under the Special Economic Zone Act, and an inland container depot under the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner was served a demand notice for the assessment years of 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16. It was served on the basis that there was a default on the payment of VAT under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 in the dealing of nickel and cobalt between the Petitioner and ASTWZ 

The issue, in this case, is the decision given by Deputy Commissioner for the assessment year 2015-16, in which the assessing authority held that the petitioner is liable to pay the required tax. The concern of the petitioner is that the Appellate Authority of Joint Commissioner of Tax passed orders for the assessment year 2013-14, 2014-15 based on the same facts that stated that the petitioner is not required to pay tax under MVAT 2002. These orders were appealed against, but no decision was rendered.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The counsel for the petitioner submitted the following arguments:

  1. For the assessment year 2015-16, the nickel and cobalt were stored at AFTWZ Warehouse and was subsequently sold to either customer within AFTWZ Zone or to DTA units in AFTWZ zone. This sale comes under sales made in the course of import into India and hence exempted from the levy of State Tax in terms of Section 5(2) of the CST Act.
  2. The Assessing Officer should abide by the decision of the higher authority which passed the order on the same facts for the assessment years of 2013-14, 2014-15. This argument is supported by the Bombay High Court judgment in VIACOM 18 Media Pvt. Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra.

Respondent’s Arguments

The counsel for the respondent submitted the following arguments:

  1. The writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner has the alterative remedy to approach the appellate authority. However, it didn’t choose the same because of the statutory requirement of a 10% deposit of the value in dispute.
  2. The orders passed for the assessment year of 2013-14, 2014-15 were appealed, and therefore the petitioner’s arguments based on these orders are not valid.
  3. There is no provision mentioned in the MVAT Act that AFTWZ can be treated as a place outside India. Also, no provision states that the SEZ area cannot come under the taxability of this act.

Court’s Observations

The court relied upon the decision in the VIACOM judgment of the court and observed that the assessing authorities before making a decision should have looked upon and considered the decision given by the higher appellate authority passed on the same facts of the assessment year of 2013-14, 2014-15.

The court did not comment on whether “this is a sale in the course of import”, but since the facts of the assessment years of 2013-14 and 2014-15 look identical to the assessment year of 2015-16, the assessing authority should have taken into consideration the decision of the appellate authority.

Judgment

The order of the assessing officer was set aside, and the case was remanded back to the authority to look into the facts considering the previous orders on the 2013-14 and 2014-15 assessment years.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -