Bombay HC: Commissioner’s Power Under the Disability Act Not Just Confined to Taking Up Cases

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

Justice Milind A. Jadhav, Bombay High Court held that the Commissioner could give orders under the act after hearing the appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Welfare of the Persons with Disabilities established under the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.

Facts of the Case

The respondent was working as a bus conductor in a BEST bus run by Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking, a statutory authority. He suffered from an accident on one day due to which he underwent many knee surgeries and had knee plates inserted. Afterwards, he was referred by the authority to have a medical checkup done where they certified that he has 41% permanent disability. Later, he was referred to other hospitals in which Sir J.J. Hospital confirmed that he has a disability of 17%. Then All India Institute of Physical Medical and Rehabilitation refused to give him a disability certificate because he had a disability of less than 40%.

The respondent was later reinstated to a lighter job but was removed by the authority. The respondent filed a writ petition before the High Court but was asked to approach the Commissioner, an authority under the Disabilities Act, 1995, to look into the matter. The Commissioner partly allowed the plea of the respondent and asked the petitioner to reinstate him. The petitioner approached the High Court, asking the court to reconsider the decision of the Commissioner. The case was again sent to Commissioner of the Welfare of the Disabled who again reiterated the decision. The present writ petition was filed to quash the decision of the Commissioner.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The counsel for the petitioner submitted the following arguments:

  1. The respondent does have a disability of less than 40%. As per the requirement of the act, the disability benefits can be given only to a person who has a minimum of 40% permanent disability.
  2. The Commissioner does not have the authority to ask the employer to reinstate the respondent. It can only give advice but can’t give orders under the act.

Respondent’s Arguments

The counsel for the respondent submitted the following arguments:

  1. The disability certificate issued by Lok Manya Tilak Hospital (the first hospital he was referred to) said that the respondent has a disability of 41%. This was supported by medical officers as well.
  2. The disability certificate issued by Sir J.J. Hospital, stating that he has a disability of 17% is not valid as the hospital did no proper investigation.

Court’s Observations

The court analysed the arguments of both the parties in two steps:

Medical Disability certificate

The court observed that when the disability certificate and medical checkup was thoroughly done by the KEM Hospital and Lok Manya Hospital, there was no need to send the respondent to the other hospital. Moreover, the certificate issued by Sir J.J. Hospital cannot be considered as a proper test since no proper identification was present on the certificate, concluding that the respondent has 17% disability. Hence, the report of KEM & Lok Manya Hospitals are reliable.

Authority of the Commissioner under the Disability Act, 1995

The court relied heavily upon the Supreme Court decision in Geetaben Ratilal v. District Primary Education where it was held that upon a combined reading of section 42 and section 62 of the act, it could be seen that the Commissioner is not confined just with the power of taking up the cases, but can also give the required orders.

Court’s Decision

Going through the provisions of the Disability Act of 1995 and the 2016 act, as well the judgments, and medical certificates, the court safely held that the medical reports of the KEM & Lok Manya Hospitals are valid and that the Commissioner’s decision under the act was accurate. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -