Bombay High Court: Authority Cannot Withhold Compensation Amount Under Railways Act Once It Is Decided

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

In the case of Premier Ltd. V. Union of India & others, Justices Ujjal Bhuyan and N.R. Borkar of the Bombay High Court on 3rd August 2020 interpreted relevant provisions of Railways Act, 1989.

Facts of the Case

The Central Government issued a notification for the acquisition of certain properties under a particular rail project. The Petitioner’s land was also acquired under this. The Respondent had decided the compensation amount for the acquisition of land, but it was not paid to the Petitioner due to illegal structures existing on the property. The Petitioner was asked to remove them to get this compensation.  

Petitioner’s Arguments

The Petitioner submitted the following arguments:

  1. The Respondent by their notifications did not ask for the land not to have any illegal structures on it. Therefore, the Respondent cannot ask the Petitioner to remove the structures from the property after the amount of compensation has been decided.
  2. As per law, the land is now absolutely transferred to the Central Government, and therefore, the Petitioner cannot remove the structures now.
  3. In the case of Chandraprabhaben Navinchandra B. v. State of Gujarat, the Gujarat High Court held that once the compensation is decided, it has to be paid without any conditions.

Respondent’s Arguments

The Respondent submitted the following arguments:

  1. The Petitioner allowed the encroachment on the land so that he can extract more money as compensation for removing said encroachments.
  2. The compensation was being withheld because of the illegal structures on the land, and according to the law, the land should be vacant. Therefore, the Petitioner should remove these structures after which the compensation can be given.
  3. According to the law, the land is still under physical possession of the Petitioner, and therefore, only the Petitioner can remove the encroachment.

Court’s Analysis

The court analyzed and interpreted various provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 to come to a decision. They observed the following:

First, there is no dispute on the fact that no law was violated in the advertisement for the acquisition of land. Second, If section 20-E of the act is interpreted, then it can be seen that the land shall rest with the government. Third, if section 20-H and section 20-I of the act are read together, then it can be understood that as soon as the compensation is decided, then it shall be given to the competent authority before the actual acquisition of the land. Fourth, the competent authority does not have the power to withhold the compensation amount under any condition. And lastly, the term ‘central government’ in the Railways act does not include railways.

Court’s Decision

After deliberation, the Court gave the following decision:

Firstly, the administration shall pay compensation to the Petitioner. Secondly, the government shall pay 6% interest on the compensation from the time of deposit of money to the Petitioner. Lastly, the Petitioner shall surrender the land within 60 days after receiving the notice.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -