Bombay HC Temporarily Restrains Emami from Using the Term ‘Glow & Handsome’

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

A single bench of Bombay High Court’s Justice S.C. Gupte gave an order in the case of Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Emami Ltd. Here, the Court granted an interim injunction on Emami from using the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’.

Brief Facts of the Case

The present case came before the Court when the Plaintiff HUL, a prior user of the term ‘Glow and Handsome’ under its trademark ‘fair and lovely’, filed an interim application for restraining the defendant Emami from using the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’.

Petitioner’s Arguments

The counsel for the petitioner submitted the following arguments:

  1. The plaintiff has been selling the products under their trademark ‘Fair & Lovely’ since 1975 and has since then become a household name.
  2. The plaintiff applied for registration of the new trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’ on 7 September 2018. They announced their intention of selling products under the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’ on 3 July 2020, and the permission for using this trademark came from the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) on 3 August 2020.
  3. They advertised the new trademark extensively.
  4. The defendant, on 27 July 2020, announced the use of the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’ for its products.

Therefore, the application for an interim injunction is filed.

Respondent’s Arguments

The counsel for the respondent submitted that:

  1. They have been using the trademark ‘Fair & Handsome’, and hence, the plaintiff cannot use the term ‘Glow & Handsome’.
  2. They have already filed an infringement petition in the Calcutta High Court against the Plaintiff (no interim relief granted yet).
  3. They applied for the trademark registration of ‘Glow and Handsome’ on 25 June 2020, and the trademark journal published the same.
  4. They also digitally launched the trademark ‘Glow and Handsome’ on 27 June 2020.

Court’s Observations

The Court after analysing the rival submissions observed that:

  1. The plaintiff appears to be a prior adopter and user of the term ‘Glow and Handsome’ as it has already launched products under this name in the market, whereas the defendant is still in the adopting stage.
  2. However, that jurisdiction on whether such use of the term by the plaintiff amounts to infringement or not lies with the Calcutta High Court only.
  3. On the argument that even if the plaintiff adopted the name first, they could not prove to have sufficient public name, it was observed that they had spent a good amount in the advertisement of their product under the new title, thus, raising doubt in the defendant’s argument.

Court’s Decision

The defendant is restrained from using the term ‘Glow & Handsome’ for the time being till the final disposal of the case. Moreover, the plaintiff cannot claim any equity through this order as this order does not have any effect on the jurisdiction and decision of the Calcutta High Court.

The defendant shall file I.A. in two weeks followed by a rejoinder if any, within two weeks after. The hearing on I.A. shall be listed after five weeks.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -