Allahabad High Court Seeks State’s Response on the Release of Paediatrician Dr. Khan

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

The Allahabad High Court has asked the Centre and Uttar Pradesh government to file their replies in the habeas corpus plea seeking the release of Dr Kafeel Khan, who is detained under the National Security Act (NSA) for giving a provocative speech during anti – Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests.

Facts of the Case

Mr Khan was arrested on 19 January 2020 for giving a speech at the Aligarh Muslim University (that was deemed provocative by the BJP-led Uttar Pradesh Government) on 13 December 2019 amidst the raging anti–Citizenship (Amendment) Act protests. It is to be noted that he had been granted bail by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh on 10 February 2020. However, he was not released. Hence, his detention was considered as illegal. Moreover, after about five days (15 February 2020), he was charged under the NSA Act by the Aligarh District Magistrate. Currently, he is lodged at the Mathura Jail until further notice.

Petitioner’s Submissions

This Habeas corpus plea was moved by Mr Khan’s mother, Nuzhat Parween, who had approached the Supreme Court of India in March this year, seeking her son’s release. However, the Bench disposed of the plea with an observation that Allahabad HC is the appropriate forum for dealing with the issue. Following the same, she had filed the writ petition under the High Court of Allahabad. The plea challenges Mr Khan’s detention for four days (from 10 to 14 February 2020) even after the sanction of bail and seeks the release of Mr Khan who’s been staying at the jail since January this year.

Court’s Decision 

On 5 August 2020 the High Court of Allahabad consisting a bench of justices, Manoj Mishra and Deepak Verma had passed the order stating,

“…positively reply to the amended petition be filed. In the meantime, Union of India may also file counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall inform the learned counsel for Union of India about this order in writing within 48 hours.”

The Allahabad HC seeks the centre and state’s response for the release of Mr Khan who’s been lodged at the jail since the beginning of this year. The matter will be further considered on 19 August 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -