Allahabad High Court Grants Interim Relief to Government Counsel Accused of Rape

Must Read

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Follow us

On July 31st, the Allahabad High Court granted Interim Relief from Arrest to Shailender Singh Chauhan, Additional Chief Standing Counsel at the Allahabad High Court until the next hearing of the case. The case pending before the Court is the matter of Shailender Singh Chauhan v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. & Others.

Background of the Case

A young woman lawyer from Delhi has alleged that Shailender Singh Chauhan had raped her in his Chamber. Following the same, an FIR was filed at the Vibhuti Khand Police Station in Gomati Nagar area. Charges were filed under Sections 328 (Causing hurt utilizing poison, etc., with intent to commit an offence), 354A (Sexual harassment) and 376 (Rape) of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Arguments before the Court

Chauhan had approached the High Court stating that they were false allegations. Thus, the FIR ought to be quashed. Advocates Lalit Kishore Pandey and Sushil Kumar Singh represented Chauhan while Govt. Advocate Aditya Vikram Shahi appeared for the State.

The Court refused to quash the proceedings instantly, while had given interim relief from arrest to Chauhan. However, the Court had granted time to the Complainant’s lawyer to file a reply in the matter.

The Complainant’s statement under Section 164 (Recording of confessions and statements) of CrPC had been recorded by the Trial Court. It stated that some relevant material was left at Chauhan’s Chamber (the place of offence) and the IO had moved an application for taking possession. This application is presently pending. Complete instructions in the matter were yet to be corroborated.

Observations of the Court

Given the submissions, the Divisional Bench of the Court directed the concerned Trial Courts to pass necessary orders on the pending application. Additionally, it also directed the investigating agencies to obtain approvals to attach relevant materials that are to be collected from the Chauhan’s Chamber.

The Bench of Justices, Attau Rahman Masoodi and Rajeev Singh held the following:

“Looking to the contents of the FIR, prima facie, we are satisfied that a case for intervention is made out to the extent that the Petitioner (accused) may not be arrested in connection with the case crime till the next date of hearing.”

Further, Chauhan has been instructed not to indulge himself in any doings w.r.t the Complainant to any intimidation or to cause any threat to the female lawyer’s life or property. Moreover, he was further directed to cooperate with the investigations by the Court’s interim order.

The matter is listed for consideration on August 27th, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -