Allahabad High Court Grants Guardianship of Husband in Comatose Condition to His Wife

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

On 15th June 2020, the Allahabad HC invoked the doctrine of Parens Patriae. The Court was acting under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and granted the guardianship of a husband in a vegetative state to his wife. It is a unique judgment. So far, there is no legislation which allows a guardian to a person in a vegetative state. Moreover, there were no such precedents where a person in a coma to have a guardian. Only minors, persons with several disabilities or mentally challenged persons could have guardians.

The doctrine of Parens Patriae 

Parens Patriae is a Latin term which refers to the parent of the country. The doctrine of Parens Patriae gets its roots from English Common Law. It dates back to the Chancery Courts of England during the middle ages. The primary role of Chancery Courts was to handle cases relating to the welfare of the children. They were mainly concerned with guardianship cases. In such cases, the King had the authority to act as the father to the children whose custody was secure with the King. It justified the Court’s intervention in the lives of children and their families.

Factual background

In Uma Mittal & Ors. v. UOI & Ors, the patient (petitioner’s husband) could not communicate. He was also breathing through a ‘Tracheotomy Tube’ in his throat. He was being fed with a ‘Peg Tube’ attached to his stomach. Moreover, caregivers had to change his position after several intervals to avoid bedsores. It was very difficult for the petitioner No.1, i.e. his wife, to handle the situation. The main reason was that there were a lot of financial crunches that the wife had to meet. It was because the children required treatment as well.

It becomes imperative to have a guardian for someone in a vegetative or comatose state. These people need extensive care. From feeding them using a tube to managing their muscle tone, everything requires a lot of care. People in such a state are prone to infections and other medical issues such as fever and seizures. Caregivers have to prepare exclusive bedding for them to prevent pressure sores.

Court’s Observation

In this case, the Allahabad HC invoked the doctrine of Parens patriae. The doctrine gives the HC the power to give directions when no remedy is provided in any statute. In this way, the Court serves the ends of justice. The Court invokes this jurisdiction in exceptional situations. In the instant case, there was no specific legislation that gave the remedy of a guardian to a person who was in a comatose state.

The Court also recommended the Central Government to consider enacting a special Legislation. It would enable the people lying in an unconscious state to have a guardian for themselves. This legislation is the need of the hour. As of now, there is no remedy available for persons lying in an unconscious condition in any statute. It no longer leaves the person lying in a state of coma to be helpless.

It would enable them to fulfil some important immediate obligations of their life. Some urgent matters of the family can be taken up by the guardian in the absence of that person. It will be beneficial to meet the need of the hour and to avoid any unfortunate event.

Guidelines laid down by the High Court 

The High Court went on to lay down some guidelines on the issue of guardianship for a person in a comatose state. These guidelines, the Court said, are temporary. They are meant to apply only until the legislature passes an appropriate enactment. The guidelines are as follows:

    1. A person who wants to be a guardian of a person in an unconscious state must disclose all his financial assets. It includes bank accounts, shares, debentures, stocks and other investment details.
    2. The Court will get the person in the unconscious state examined by a neurologist.
    3. The Court will also direct the Tehsildar/SDM to verify the assertions made by the potential guardian.
    4. Most likely, the Court will appoint the spouse or progeny as the guardian. The potential guardian will have to disclose all the details of the patient’s legal heirs.
    5. The Court will only appoint as guardian a person who is competent to act as a one, under Law.
    6. The guardian will have to file a report with the Registrar General of the HC every six months.
    7. The Registrar General will have to keep a separate record of the same with the Court.
    8. It will be at the perusal of the Court to appoint a guardian for a temporary basis or for a limited time frame.
    9. The Court has the authority to appoint a new guardian in case the first one misuses his authority.
    10. Whatever transactions the guardian undertakes, they must adhere to the Law.
    11. If the relative or the next friend finds that the guardian is not acting in the best interest of the patient, then he/she has the right to approach the Court for the same.
    12. The guardian must seek the Court’s permission before moving the patient to another country or hospital.

Court’s Order

A two-judge bench passed the judgment. It is high time that the Central Government take the right steps by acting promptly on the said matter. The legislature must fill the legislative chasm. It must make specific provisions regarding guardians for comatose patients. Until then, it is only appropriate for the Courts to issue guidelines to fill the lacunae.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -