Allahabad High Court Grants Guardianship of Husband in Comatose Condition to His Wife

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

On 15th June 2020, the Allahabad HC invoked the doctrine of Parens Patriae. The Court was acting under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and granted the guardianship of a husband in a vegetative state to his wife. It is a unique judgment. So far, there is no legislation which allows a guardian to a person in a vegetative state. Moreover, there were no such precedents where a person in a coma to have a guardian. Only minors, persons with several disabilities or mentally challenged persons could have guardians.

The doctrine of Parens Patriae 

Parens Patriae is a Latin term which refers to the parent of the country. The doctrine of Parens Patriae gets its roots from English Common Law. It dates back to the Chancery Courts of England during the middle ages. The primary role of Chancery Courts was to handle cases relating to the welfare of the children. They were mainly concerned with guardianship cases. In such cases, the King had the authority to act as the father to the children whose custody was secure with the King. It justified the Court’s intervention in the lives of children and their families.

Factual background

In Uma Mittal & Ors. v. UOI & Ors, the patient (petitioner’s husband) could not communicate. He was also breathing through a ‘Tracheotomy Tube’ in his throat. He was being fed with a ‘Peg Tube’ attached to his stomach. Moreover, caregivers had to change his position after several intervals to avoid bedsores. It was very difficult for the petitioner No.1, i.e. his wife, to handle the situation. The main reason was that there were a lot of financial crunches that the wife had to meet. It was because the children required treatment as well.

It becomes imperative to have a guardian for someone in a vegetative or comatose state. These people need extensive care. From feeding them using a tube to managing their muscle tone, everything requires a lot of care. People in such a state are prone to infections and other medical issues such as fever and seizures. Caregivers have to prepare exclusive bedding for them to prevent pressure sores.

Court’s Observation

In this case, the Allahabad HC invoked the doctrine of Parens patriae. The doctrine gives the HC the power to give directions when no remedy is provided in any statute. In this way, the Court serves the ends of justice. The Court invokes this jurisdiction in exceptional situations. In the instant case, there was no specific legislation that gave the remedy of a guardian to a person who was in a comatose state.

The Court also recommended the Central Government to consider enacting a special Legislation. It would enable the people lying in an unconscious state to have a guardian for themselves. This legislation is the need of the hour. As of now, there is no remedy available for persons lying in an unconscious condition in any statute. It no longer leaves the person lying in a state of coma to be helpless.

It would enable them to fulfil some important immediate obligations of their life. Some urgent matters of the family can be taken up by the guardian in the absence of that person. It will be beneficial to meet the need of the hour and to avoid any unfortunate event.

Guidelines laid down by the High Court 

The High Court went on to lay down some guidelines on the issue of guardianship for a person in a comatose state. These guidelines, the Court said, are temporary. They are meant to apply only until the legislature passes an appropriate enactment. The guidelines are as follows:

    1. A person who wants to be a guardian of a person in an unconscious state must disclose all his financial assets. It includes bank accounts, shares, debentures, stocks and other investment details.
    2. The Court will get the person in the unconscious state examined by a neurologist.
    3. The Court will also direct the Tehsildar/SDM to verify the assertions made by the potential guardian.
    4. Most likely, the Court will appoint the spouse or progeny as the guardian. The potential guardian will have to disclose all the details of the patient’s legal heirs.
    5. The Court will only appoint as guardian a person who is competent to act as a one, under Law.
    6. The guardian will have to file a report with the Registrar General of the HC every six months.
    7. The Registrar General will have to keep a separate record of the same with the Court.
    8. It will be at the perusal of the Court to appoint a guardian for a temporary basis or for a limited time frame.
    9. The Court has the authority to appoint a new guardian in case the first one misuses his authority.
    10. Whatever transactions the guardian undertakes, they must adhere to the Law.
    11. If the relative or the next friend finds that the guardian is not acting in the best interest of the patient, then he/she has the right to approach the Court for the same.
    12. The guardian must seek the Court’s permission before moving the patient to another country or hospital.

Court’s Order

A two-judge bench passed the judgment. It is high time that the Central Government take the right steps by acting promptly on the said matter. The legislature must fill the legislative chasm. It must make specific provisions regarding guardians for comatose patients. Until then, it is only appropriate for the Courts to issue guidelines to fill the lacunae.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -