All Is ‘Not’ Well: Feud Among the Hinduja Brothers Over Multi-Billion Fortune

Must Read

The Right to Information and its Working of 15 years

On 12th October 2020, RTI finished fifteen years since its commencement. The question remains whether the legislation stands up to...

An Insight into Custodial Death in India

“The occurrence of Custodial deaths in the world’s greatest democracy has raised the eyebrows of every citizen and shaken...

Implications in Travel Insurance in Light of the COVID-19 Crisis

As the world, today is crippled by this once in a century pandemic and as of date more than...

Second-Round Effects of Rent Control Laws: The Argentine Case

Introduction In colonial India, a city had an issue with its cobra population, which was a problem clearly in need...

Why Are the Big Techs of Silicon Valley Accused of Anti-Competitive Behaviours?

The big tech giants of the Silicon Valley are facing major challenges with relation to their monopolistic powers after...

KSK announces Sanjay Kumar as a Partner for Pharma & Life Sciences Practice

New Partner for KSK's Pharma & Life Sciences Practice King Stubb & Kasiva recently announced that Mr Sanjay Kumar has...

Follow us

India Based Conglomerate Hinduja Group’s net-worth is 50 billion dollars as of 2020. The group is active in traditional sectors. Some of these are banking (Induslnd Bank), finance, energy and transport. It is now an international conglomerate with its presence in 38 countries over the world.

On June 23, 2020, UK’s Royal Court of Justice ruled in favour of Srichand Hinduja. The case was on the issue of control of Hinduja Bank, headquartered in Switzerland. This ruling was against Srichand’s 3 younger brothers: Gopichand, Prakash and Ashok.

Srichand Hinduja is the ‘current patriarch’ and chairman of the Hinduja Group. The younger 3 brothers are the co-chairmen of the Hinduja group. At the centre of this billion-dollar legal battle is a letter from 2014. Both Srichand and his daughter Vinoo sought the court of London to declare the letter void. They signed the letter on 2nd July 2014. It stated that ‘assets held in any single brother’s name belong to all four’. They had asked the Court to declare the letter as having no legal effect as a will or any other binding document. The other three brothers fought to ensure that the contents of the letter are not revoked.

What is the feud about?

A letter signed in 2014 by the 4 brothers stated that each one of them would be each other’s executor. Trouble ensued between the brothers in 2016. This was when Srichand expressed that the 2014 agreement does not reflect his wishes. He urged that his and his family’s assets must be separated. Justice Falk of the Court of Justice heard this matter.

He stated that the 3 younger brothers tried to use this letter as leverage. Their aim was to take control of the Hinduja Bank of Switzerland. The control of the bank is in Srichand’s sole name. The reason behind the feud is that the younger brothers believed that Srichand lacked the capacity to control the bank. They said that this was because he suffered from Lewy body disease. This disease is a form of dementia.

UK Court’s Decision

The defendants (three brothers) contested another fact. This was that Srichand’s daughter Vinoo represented him in court. They further argued that Vinoo has her own personal agenda in pursuing the case. They urged that an independent solicitor should represent Srichand. However, the judge ruled that “she does not have an adverse interest” in the case.

Thus, they allowed Vinoo to act as her father’s “litigation friend”. The certificate of suitability confirms this. It says that Srichand is no longer in a state to give instructions to lawyers. Hence, he has asked his daughter to do so, the court said. Further, Clifford Chance (Srichand’s law firm) sent an email on May 2, 2015. This stated that Srichand did not consider himself legally bound by the letter. A further letter from the firm dated July 24, 2015, reiterated the fact that Srichand was not bound by it. He made the same point in a letter he sent dated July 16, 2015. The Court ruled in favour of Srichand. They stated that the defendant’s contentions had led to financial disruption. This had affected both Srichand and his immediate family.

Will Srichand’s assets pass on to his daughter?

The three brothers noted that if the claim succeeds then all assets in Srichand’s name would pass to Vinoo. They would also go to her immediate family on Srichand’s death. This includes the entire shareholding in Hinduja Bank, according to the judgement.

What is at stake for the Hinduja Empire?

The Bloomberg Billionaires Index values the fortune of Hinduja Brothers at $11.2 billion. This litigation has shaken the foundation of the Hinduja conglomerate. It will definitely impact the business. The 3 brothers stated that these proceedings are against their family values. They stated that they intend to defend the claim to uphold these family values.

Another fact emerged during the hearing. The four brothers are also embroiled in litigation in Switzerland as well as New Jersey. During these proceedings, Srichand’s family consolidated their position in the Hinduja Bank. Srichand’s daughter Shanu Hinduja took over as the chairman of the bank and her son Karam Hinduja was made the CEO. The brothers have maintained that this litigation will not have any impact on their global businesses. The group will continue to function as it has been. But there could be a sentimental impact on the stock prices of these companies for the short term.

The legal fight is likely to continue between the brothers. They have already hinted that they are adamant to defend their family values. If so, a division of the Hinduja Empire is anticipated sooner or later. More so, because the next generation of the family is active in the operations of the family business. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -