Allahabad High Court Confirms Anticipatory Bail to Priyanka Gandhi’s Personal Secretary

Must Read

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Follow us

The Lucknow bench —Hon’ble Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.— of the Allahabad High Court, on 7th August 2020 granted anticipatory bail to Sandeep Singh, the personal secretary of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. This case, (Sandeep Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Sect. Home. & Another), was in connection to the alleged forging of a list of 1,000 buses that the Congress Party arranged for the UP Government, to bring back the ferry migrant laborers, until the filing of the police report.

Facts of the Case

Around 1,000 buses were on offer for plying the migrant workers from the Ghaziabad – Noida border. As it came to light, the papers of 150 of 1000 vehicles were not in order. It was also found that a number of the sanctioned vehicles were autos, three-wheelers, ambulances, trucks, etc. It came to light that these vehicles did not have proper fitness certificates and other documents were also invalid. The police report further states that the Congress leaders did not obtain inter-state movement passes. Hence, this violates the regulations and guidelines issued by the Government.

An FIR was filed against Mr. Singh and UP Congress Chief, Ajay Kumar Lallu, who were subsequently booked under various sections of the IPC. Some of the prominent charges include those under Sections 177 (Furnishing false information), 182 (False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person), 336 ( An act endangering life or personal safety of others), 417 (Cheating), 420 (Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 468 (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 505 (1) (b) & (2) (Statements conducing to public mischief) read with Section 120B (Criminal Conspiracy) IPC. The FIR was filed in the Hazratganj Police station on 9th May 2020.

Mr. Lallu had been arrested and was sent to jail, but was later granted bail. Meanwhile, Mr. Singh had requested the court to pass an order of Anticipatory Bail to avoid arrest. This application was filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.145 of 2020, under charges filed as stated in the FIR.

Submissions before the Court

The Counsel for the Accused (Mr. Singh) challenges that he is merely a private Secretary of Ms. Vadra. Thus, he wrote letters to the Additional Chief Secretary, Mr. Awanish Awasthi, Principal Secretary (Home), and the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Ultimately, it was Ms. Vadra, who on behalf of the Congress Party, offered buses for transporting the migrant workers during the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mr. Singh was merely conveying the messages and writing letters on her behalf as a part of his employment duties. Additionally, it is explicitly stated in the FIR that Ms. Vadra was not an Accused in question.

Observations of the Court

Looking at the triviality of the offense and nature of the allegations, the Court was inclined to admit Mr. Singh’s plea of anticipatory bail till filing of the police report. The Court allowed Mr. Singh’s plea.

In their order, they observed that if arrested, the Applicant should be released on bail, on furnishing a personal bond. The amount set for the bond is Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of a similar amount. The Bench further stated that he should co-operate in the investigation without causing any misdeeds.

In the end, Mr. Singh was granted bail with the following conditions. First, the Applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. Second, the Applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer. Finally, the Applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -