Allahabad HC Disproves Allegation of Minority Made by Girl’s Father; Sets Her Free To Make Her Own Decisions

Must Read

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was...

Follow us

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad, on an order dated 17th September 2020, set Neha Verma free and gave her the liberty to choose who she wanted to live with as she was legally 18 years old and an adult.

Facts of the Case

The present Habeas corpus writ petition was filed by the second petitioner, Ramu claiming that the first petitioner (Neha Verma) – whom he was married to according to Hindu rites on the 14th of January, 2020 at the Arya Samaj, Chowk, at Prayag. However, her father (Mewa Lal), had asked the custody of her stating that she was sixteen and a half years old by producing the birth certificate at the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi and following the same she was detained unlawfully.

On 3rd September 2020, she was initially produced at the court (as per the order dated 1st September 2020), she had affirmed the marriage with Ramu and wanted to go with her husband stating that she was 18 years old and had the right to choose her path and take decisions in her life. She has expressly declined to go with her father.

Submissions Before the Court

The learned Counsel for the respondent no.4 had disputed the first petitioner’s age and had said that she was a minor and was only about sixteen and a half years old according to the birth certificate obtained from the A.D.O. panchayat, Kaushambi that was dated, 22nd January 2020.

However, the said certificate mentioned her birth date as 15th May 2004 and it was only obtained after her marriage which raised suspicions. When asked for previous schooling records, her school-leaving certificate that was also obtained after her marriage with Ramu had the date 15th May 2004 as her birth date. However, it is to be noted that other columns such as the age of the scholar during the time of school-leaving (which was one of the most decisive columns) was left blank. And all other important documents from the Primary Vidyalaya, Nandauli, in Kaushambi were also left blank. When the Headmaster and the S.R. Registrar were called upon and were asked as to why these columns related to her date of birth were left blank – they didn’t give any convincing answers. In the opinion of the Court, under the relevant section 94 (2) under the Juvenile Justice Act, ranking the medical evidence was collected regarding the first petitioner’s age in the Court.

Court’s Decision

In view of the above submissions at the Court, the bench of Justice J.J. Munir had directed that there was no valid certification of the first petitioner’s age based on the date of birth obtained from the School records and the Panchayat as it raised suspicions. So, the medico-legal report obtained by the Chief Medical officer, Kaushambi which stated that Neha Verma was about 18-19 years of age was considered final.

She was let free to choose her path – she chose her husband, Ramu. Further, the Court had stated that the first petitioner’s with her father, Mewa Lal is unlawful and cannot be permitted to continue. Also, the original records from the school, panchayat and primary school were to be lodged with the court and were directed to be retained in a sealed cover within 24 hours of the said order.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

Supreme Court Upheld “Environmental Rule of Law” in NGT Decision to Demolish Illegal Hotel on Forest Land

This case concerns the dispute relating to the additional construction of hotel-cum-restaurant structure in the Bus Stand Complex along with a bus stand and...

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -