Allahabad HC Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging the State Public Services Tribunal’s Order

Must Read

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Follow us

On an order dated, 4th September 2020, the writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar Singh was dismissed by the High Court of Allahabad stating that the learned Tribunal had given a just, fair, and reasonable order regarding the dismissal of his claims and about the given punishment. 

Facts of the Case

Rajesh Kumar Singh (Petitioner) was a civil police constable at the Chandauli district till the year 2011. He was then transferred to Mau district but didn’t submit his joining and remained absent for about more than four years (1295 days). Following the same, an inquiry was conducted by the respective authority and as a result, it was found that it violated the U.P. Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956. In accordance, it was decided by the State Public Services Tribunal that Rajesh would not get any salary for the aforementioned period w.r.t the principle of ‘no work no pay’.

Submissions at the Court

A writ petition was filed under the High Court of Judicature, Allahabad by Rajesh Kumar against the order dated 18th October 2019 which was passed by the State Public Services Tribunal. The order had discharged Rajesh Kumar’s claims and had affirmed the order of punishment under the Sections of U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. The order stated that:

  • the claims as raised by Rajesh Kumar were that he was unable to submit his joining at the transferred district due to his immediate hospitalization for his serious illness. He had also submitted various medical documents on different dates throughout 1295 days. But, the learned authority had dismissed saying that it was not prudent when he was able to go to different hospitals but not once to inform the respective department of police regarding his absence in four long years.
  • the Tribunal furthermore had justified the acts and directions of the Police Department and Disciplinary Authority as it was well-investigated and the procedures were in accordance with the principle of natural justice.

Court’s Reading

The Bench of Hon’ble Justices Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Dinesh Kumar Singh had stated that the order dated 10th October 2019 given by the learned Tribunal is just, fair and reasonable as Rajesh Kumar had not given a reasonable and cogent explanation for his prolonged and wilful absence for about four years. Accordingly, the punishment directed is also rightly upheld. Hence, the writ petition was dismissed and no case was made out to interfere with the impugned order directed by the learned Tribunal.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -