Allahabad HC Dismisses Mandamus Seeking Justification of the State’s Actions

Must Read

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Follow us

High Court of Allahabad, on the order dated, 17th September 2020, had dismissed a mandamus writ petition that was filed by an ex-army man who had applied for a post in the Civil Police and Constable PAC Direct Recruitment in the year 2018.

Facts of the Case

On 16th November 2018, an advertisement was given by the Respondents inviting the applications for the recruitment in UP Civil Police and Constable PAC Direct Recruitment. 18th December of the same year was the last date to register in online mode. The petitioner applied online under the Ex-army men quota which was a horizontal reservation to an extent of 5%. And, following the same, he had appeared and cleared the preliminary written examination. On 7th January 2020, he was called in for document verification and physical eligibility test. However, he was informed that the domicile certificate produced by him was dated 12th February 2019 thus, which was issued after the last date of submission of the application forms, hence can’t be taken into consideration. As a result, he was not allowed to take a physical eligibility test.

On 2nd March 2020 when the final result was declared, the petitioner, as a consequence of the aforementioned incident, was not selected for the post. The petitioner had approached the court, seeking mandamus directing the respondents to consider his candidature under the Ex-army men category.

Submissions before the Court

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that there was no need for filing a domicile certificate to seek the benefit of reservation under Ex-army men quota. Furthermore, the Domicile Certificate was required to be filed by only those claiming vertical reservation. And, there was no need for a domicile certificate, as he wasn’t claiming any vertical reservation.

The learned counsel appearing for the state had said that the petitioner was seeking benefit under the Ex-army men category which was extended under 5% horizontal reservation. The same was admissible only to those who are original residents of the State of Uttar Pradesh and to establish that a Domicile Certificate was very much needed. Also, the domicile certificate which should have been issued between 2018 till the last date fixed for filing of the application form as it was required to prove the domicile status of the candidate seeking reservation. Also, per the application form, the petitioner was supposed to submit the domicile certificate in accordance with the aforementioned details during the online registration. However, the petitioner despite claiming the benefit of horizontal reservation did not mention details of the domicile certificate in the online application form. The age of the petitioner, whose date of birth is 1st of July, 1981 and served in the Army for about eight years, would work out to around 19 years by the said formula in the advertisement.

Moreover, the domicile certificate allegedly produced by him before the authorities at the time of document verification is admittedly dated 12/15 February 2019, which was thus issued after the expiry of the last date fixed for submitting the online application forms. Such a certificate could not be considered given the restriction mentioned in the advertisement.

Court’s Decision

Given the above submissions at the Court, the bench of the learned Judge Manoj Kumar Gupta states that there was no illegality in the action of the respondents in declining to consider the candidature of the petitioner under the horizontal reservation category of Ex-army men and had dismissed the petition as it lacked merit.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -