Pro-CAA Or Anti-CAA: Analysis Of The Events Leading To the Delhi Riots of 2020

Must Read

An Illummination of the Home Ministry’s Commission for Revision of Penal Laws

The Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860. It was formed after the draft was created by the first...

Political Parties and the Affair of Symbols

Introduction A political party is a group of people with the same ideology, intention, and agenda who try to hold power through...

Withdrawal of Judges in light of the Principle of “Nemo Judex In Causa Sua”: An Analysis

"Justice, and the arrival of that justice being delivered, is essential to the protection of the guideline of thumb of law. Justice implies - consistency, in technique and result...

Explained: The Scope of Article 21 During the Era of COVID-19

“One’s right to self, their body, their health, and their livelihoods is inherent to living a meaningful human life, Human...

Explained: Events That Led To the 2020 Rajasthan Political Crisis

The government has been toppled in the state of Rajasthan, following which petitions have been filed in the High...

How Gorakhpur Doctor Kafeel Khan’s Hate Speech Threatened the National Security of India

Dr Kafeel Khan has recently been released from the Mathura Jail after the Allahabad HC sets aside his detention...

Follow us

In North East Delhi, there were many surges of bloodshed, damage to property, and riots from 23rd February 2020. These resulted in tussles between anti-CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act)  protesters and pro-CAA protesters. It became communal, generating the deaths of 53 individuals within ten days. This article discusses the events and the responses from the Government officials and the Judiciary concerning the riots. The article provides a possible course of action for the same.

Events leading up to the Delhi riots of 2020

The CAA, enacted in 2019, created some special provisions for the citizenship of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis, and Christians, from Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan. This faced criticism for being against the secular nature of the nation. Staging of demonstrations across the country to protest against the Act began from December 2019. It was more concentrated in the NCR region. Sit-in protests, i.e. people occupying an area and refusing to leave until fulfilling their demands, became very common.

A sit-in protest against the CAA took place near the Jaffrabad metro station in North-East Delhi. This rendered part of the Seelampur-Jaffrabad-Maujpur road as well as the metro station itself.

On 23rd February 2020, BJP leader Kapil Mishra posted a tweet inviting people to join him in Maujpur Chowk at 3 pm. As per the tweet, it was in retaliation of Jaffrabad. He also issued a three-day ultimatum to the police to clear the streets of Jaffrabad and Chand Bagh.

What happened through the course of the riots?

After the issuance of Mr Mishra’s statements, violence commenced between pro-CAA protesters and anti-CAA protesters in Karawal Nagar and Maujpur Chowk.

Clashes continued the next day with signs of property damage showing. It spread to several areas of North-East Delhi, including Gokalpuri and Kardampuri.  Both temples and mosques were burnt down. One man opened fire on the police, and later the police arrested him. People attacked petrol pumps in Bhajanpura, carrying petrol bombs, and sticks. Shops and houses of the Hindu community were burnt by a Muslim mob where bodies were later discovered. Subsequently, a crowd chanting ‘Jai Shri Ram’ burned down a Muslim-owned tyre market.

An Ashok Nagar mosque was vandalized on 25th February. Ankit Sharma, an Intelligence Bureau officer, was found dead in a Jaffrabad drain. Mobs started attacking journalists amongst the commotion.

The last of the riots continued till 29th February 2020. There were 53 recorded deaths as a result of these riots.

Response from the Police and the Government

Two people filed complaints against BJP leader Kapil Mishra on 23rd February itself for inciting violence using inflammatory speech.

At the first signs of conflict, the police lathi-charged the fighting crowds and used tear gas on them as well. Delhi Police Head Constable Ratan Lal lost his life while trying to control the masses. They imposed Section 144 in the 10 locations in North-East Delhi, which were riot-hit areas, but it was not of much use.

On 25th February, they deployed massive police force in the more sensitive areas like Jaffrabad, Maujpur-Babarpur, Gokulpuri, Johri Enclave and Shiv Vihar.

National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and AAP leaders visited violence-affected areas on 26th February. Three days after the violence broke out, PM Modi tweeted and asked people to maintain peace and brotherhood.

The rioters allegedly used the house of Tahir Hussain, an AAP councillor and later arrested him for murder. However, the investigation is still pending

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal declared free treatment for injured persons on 27th February. The government made arrangements to supply food in curfew-imposed areas. They set up shelters with the help of NGOs. They also announced a compensation amount of 10 lakh rupees to affected people, 1 lakh rupees in exemplary damages, and 5 lakh rupees in the case of deaths of minors.  For people whose houses were burnt entirely, they announced immediate aid of 25,000 rupees.

They created 2 Special Investigation Teams (SIT) to investigate the matter.  Up until 6th March 2020, the Delhi police lodged 654 cases and detained 1,820 cases.

The response of the Judiciary

The Delhi High Court constituted four new Courts for hearing the cases on 15th June. According to the orders issued by the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, 9 Judicial Officers were transferred to Sessions and Magisterial Courts.

Future possible course of action

Accountability is essential in a situation like this. So is the awareness that we cannot tolerate something like this.

Statements condemning this incident need to be issued. India is a country that completely shut down a peaceful movement (Non-cooperation Movement) for its independence because of one bloody incident (Chauri-Chaura incident). It goes to show that there are many ways to achieve any means, and not all are ethical.

Yes, India has a long and bloody history of riots and religious violence. It does not mean it can or should continue. As far as accountability goes, the Supreme Court is already making strides towards this by setting up Trial Courts. However, they must ensure to take strict action towards anybody who has contributed to this starting from instigation to actual participation.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Pulls up PMC, Asks to Shift Waste Processing Plant at Baner

  Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 27th October 2020, directed Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to close the plant and shift it to...

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -