Does PM really CARES?

Must Read

Explained: Events That Led To the 2020 Rajasthan Political Crisis

The government has been toppled in the state of Rajasthan, following which petitions have been filed in the High...

How Gorakhpur Doctor Kafeel Khan’s Hate Speech Threatened the National Security of India

Dr Kafeel Khan has recently been released from the Mathura Jail after the Allahabad HC sets aside his detention...

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris Administration: A Boon or Bane for US-India Partnership?

Joe Biden, the speculative Democratic nominee for president, will place a very high priority on continuing to strengthen the...

Is the Reservation System Making or Breaking India?

Introduction India is a sovereign, secular, democratic republic whose current state is a result of continuous amendments and modifications in...

Should the Election Commission’s Idea of Remote Voting be Implemented?

Out of the 28 states and the 8 Union Territories, 7 of them have elections in 2020-2021. The whole...

Facebook Anti-Hate Speech Controversy and its implementation in India

The Wall Street Journal, a US-based news agency published a new report. This report is about Facebook and its...

Follow us

What is PM CARES Fund?

PM CARES Fund stands for ‘Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund’. It was set up with the primary aim of dealing with any kind of emergency or distress situation. Especially, like posed by Covid-19 pandemic, and to provide relief to the affected. The Fund is to provide aid in case of future crises as well. One can donate to the Fund through various means and it has a separate website for the same as well.

Three key objectives of the fund are:

  • To aid relief in a public health emergency or any kind of calamity or distress, either man-made or natural. This includes the creation or up-gradation of healthcare or medical facilities.
  • To provide financial aid, or take necessary steps as per the direction of the Board of Trustees.
  • To take up such activities that are not in conflict with the Fund’s objectives.

What constitutes PM CARES Fund?

The PM CARE Fund constitutes of

  • Prime Minister is the ex-officio Chairman of the PM CARES Fund. Moreover, Defence Minister, Home Minister, Finance Minister, and GoI are ex-officio Trustees of the Fund.
  • The power to nominate three Trustees to the Board of Trustees rests with the Chairman. These Trustees must be eminent persons in the field of research, health, science, social work, law, public administration and philanthropy.
  • A person appointed as a Trustee must act in pro bono capacity.
  • Voluntary contributions from individuals/organizations form the Fund. It does not get any budgetary support and used in meeting the above-mentioned goals.
  • Donations to PM CARES Fund comes under 80G benefits for 100% exemption under the Income Tax Act,1961. These donations are also counted as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) under the Companies Act, 2013.
  • PM CARES Fund is also exempted under the FCRA and has a separate account for receiving foreign donations. It is consistent with regards to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund (PMNRF). PMNRF since 2011 has also received foreign contributions as a public trust.

How much did PM CARES Fund collect?

As per an article dated 19th May 2020, PM CARES Fund collected Rs. 10,600 Crore in less than 2 months. Of this collection, contributions from the private sector and its employees account for 53%. The PSUs and their employees account for 42% and the rest 5% came from the individual entities.

A whopping donation of Rs. 1500 Crore by the TATA Trusts and Rs. 1000 Crore from Azim Premji Foundation made headlines amongst all.

Source: TOI

Apart from PM CARES AND PMNRF, there are other sources of money designated for Covid-19 relief as well. Eg: Rs. 7,800 Crore that was available to members of parliament under the MPLADS scheme. The government took over this money and the cabinet made MPLADS funds non-operational for a period of two years. Moreover, the government also reduced the salaries and allowances of parliamentarians by 30% for one year.

Apart from this, other organisations also made donations in kind. Eg: The Indian Red Cross Society donated ventilators, masks, PPEs, and test kits valued Rs. 505 Crore. The Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) also provided masks, cooked meals, dry ration, PPE, etc.

PM CARES Fund and the Controversies

On 1st April 2020, Harsha Kandukuri, a student of the Azim Premji University, Bangalore filed an RTI application. The application sought PMO to provide the Fund’s trust deed and all government orders related to its creation and operation.

On 29th May 2020, PMO in its reply stated that PM CARES Fund is not a Public Authority within Section 2 (h) of the RTI Act, 2005.

Post this, a Hyderabad based activist names S Q Maqsood filed another RTI application. He sought a copy of the bylaws of the PM CARES Fund, bank statements, and data about the staff working for it. The RTI application also sought state-wise allocation of the PM CARES Fund. This application was also rejected on the ground that Fund was not a public authority. He was instead asked to visit the website for further information.

Besides, it was already stated by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) that it will not audit the PM CARES Fund. CAG said, “Since the fund is based on donations of individuals and organisations, it will not have any right to audit the same.”

On 11th June 2020, the PM CARES Fund updated its website in response to FAQs on the auditor of the Fund. The website claimed that Fund appointed the independent auditor on 23rd April 2020. But, the same got published on 11th June which indeed raises certain questions. PM CARES Fund appointed SARC & Associates as its independent auditor headed by Mr. Sunil Kumar Gupta.

Many people claimed that Mr. Gupta had previous links with the Modi government. He has also published a book on ‘Make in India’ initiative and it has various photos of himself posing with BJP leaders. He is also linked with Rashtriya Antyodaya Sangh (RAS), a Delhi-based NGO. The BJP-led government in Uttarakhand has largely supported RAS activities. Gupta even tweeted on 7th September 2018 about attending the World Hindu Congress in Chicago. It is interesting to note that a key speaker in this conference was RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat.

All these incidents about links of PM CARES auditor and BJP puts a question mark on the Fund.

Recently, an NGO named Centre for Public Interest Litigation filed a petition in the Supreme Court. The petitioner claimed that the Centre has been hiding the information about the collection of PM CARES Fund till date. It also urged the court to direct the Centre to:

  • Prepare,
  • Notify, and
  • Implement a national plan under the Disaster Management Act to deal with the crisis.

Interestingly, the SC sought the Centre to reply to the plea seeking transfer of PM CARES funds to NDRF.

Author’s Note

Even though from its composition, presentation and website it seems that it is a public authority. But, with PMO stating that PM CARES is not a ‘public authority’ creates heavy speculations. Does this mean the same is not controlled by the government? If so, them who is the in-charge of PM CARES Fund?

Lack of replies on the government part and denial of reply to RTIs raises certain questions on its transparency. The government should take accountability and answer all the questions. Moreover, anyone can misuse the money without any proper checks at place. But, the recent intrusion of the judiciary might keep government at toes. Yet, the lack of transparency in such a big initiative is a big blow to democracy and constitutional values of the country.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -