PM CARES or Citizen Cares for PMNRF? Why PM Modi ditched PMNRF and created PM CARES?

Must Read

What is the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016?

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (“RERA”) is an Act of the Parliament. It seeks to protect...

Should the Exorbitant Amounts Charged for RT-PCR Tests be Refunded?

Introduction A plea has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court of India seeking a refund of exorbitant amounts charged...

Should CCTV’s be Installed in the Police Station?

Introduction In a recent judgment, the bench led by Justice Nariman issued directions to both the state and Union Territory...

A Legal Analysis of the West Bengal Political Crisis on IPS Deputation

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has recently summoned three IPS officers of West Bengal (WB). The decision was...

Explained: Postal Ballot for NRIs

At the end of November 2020, Election Commission sent a proposal to the law ministry to amend the Representation...

Explained: Constitutional Provisions and Legislations With Regards to a Person with Disabilities

The world celebrates December 3 as International Day of Persons with Disabilities (IDPD). This day is also called World...

Follow us

It was 4:51 PM on 28th March 2020, when we heard about the PM-CARES (Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance & Relief in Emergency Situations) Fund having been constituted. The Fund has its objectives in “Building capacities for quick emergency response and effective community resilience” where “use of new technology and advance research findings also become an inseparable element of such concerted action.” The Prime Minister essentially is the Chairman of the Trust, including Members (Defense Minister, Home Minister and Finance Minister) that create a fine balance for a Public Charitable Trust.

In the wake of COVID-19, where the world seems to have come to a sudden and immediate halt, the cases of those infected in India seems to accelerate at the tick of a clock. The instantaneously created PM-CARES, with a probable novel cause, yet fails to convince its donors of it genuineness with the already subsisting PMNRF (Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund, 1948).

As the news of this newly established fund gained momentum, so did the response to it. Individuals, Corporates, Celebrities, and various others began sharing the details and methods of contributing through Online portals. The Corporate Affairs Secretary Injeti Srinivas in an online appeal to Company Chiefs said,

“Even if you have contributed the prescribed amount towards CSR, I would like to urge you to contribute over and above the minimum prescribed amount, which can later be offset against the CSR obligation arising in subsequent years, if you so desire.”

The Government broke the news of Tax Exemption to swell up any contributions made to the PM CARES Fund before March 31, since these would qualify for 80G exemption under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (I-T Act), this Section allows donations made to specified relief funds and charitable institutions as a deduction from gross total income before arriving at taxable income. Some notable persons and entities contributing to Fund includes

President Ram Nath Kovind;

Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu;

Actress Anushka Sharma and her cricketer-husband Virat Kohli;

Sachin Tendulkar;

Cricketer Suresh Raina;

Bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar;

Adani Foundation;

Tata Sons and Tata Trusts and so on and so forth.

Amidst all the support that PM-CARES receives, a significant entity is left unnoticed, i.e. PMNRF. An approximate amount of Rs. 3,800.44 Crore is available in the PMNRF (Offical Statement is here) through the long walk from 1948 to 2020, and what still unrests the people is how this Fund remains uncared for. The said PMNRF fund also caters to the need for Natural Disasters such as earthquakes, flood, and other calamities unforeseeable, however, PM Narendra Modi is compelled due to COVID-19, to create a fresh Fund exclusively for this Pandemic, while the funds remain unused. The PM-CARES is a smartly designed acronym to attract both the Micro donors and others, for the disaster management. The inherent predicament in this newly established PM-CARES Fund is more than two-fold since it concerns the nature of the institution in form of a public charitable trust which may be highlighted herein briefly.

A Screenshot of PMNRF Website stating the available funds as on April 1, 2020.

Firstly, what is noteworthy, is that the trust (as a legal entity), is epitomised to benefit the public, and a trustee is duty-bound to manage the trust properties in accordance with the trust deed, however in this case we notice how this Fund remains out of the “public domain”.

Secondly, it is verified that in many Common Law jurisdictions, political or legal campaigns for charitable trusts is not permitted, since charitable trusts are administered by trustees but there is no relationship between the trustee and beneficiaries, but in this case, there is a relationship, as the Trustees are elected by the Beneficiaries.

Thirdly, the Citizens of the country ought to know the Due-Process for creating the Fund, a trust deed generally is inclusive of the objects, rules and regulations for the operation of the trust, and is to be registered, through the Registration Act, 1908 and Income Tax Act, 1961, however, transparency seems to have been bypassed in the creation process.

These questions raised about were realised by some as controversial upon which many Media houses aimed to settle the purpose and objectives of the PM-CARES Fund. The justification coming from the Government sources is that while PMNRF is for all kinds of natural disasters, PM CARES fund is specially meant for COVID-19 and similar pandemic situations. As for the question of the Trust, some have spoken that since the PM is the chairman of the trust and defence minister, home minister and finance minister are its members, legal issues like registration of the trust, etc will hardly be an issue.

To conclude, it can be sadly observed that through providing the Government and other related personas an exemption, from their duties to answer questions faithfully, through self-judgment can be extremely ignorant and unintelligent. The wake of this Pandemic has been unfortunate but let it not affect the quality of the judgments that we make. is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -